Suppr超能文献

经皮气管切开术:一种比标准开放性气管切开术更具成本效益的替代方法。

Percutaneous tracheostomy: a cost-effective alternative to standard open tracheostomy.

作者信息

McHenry C R, Raeburn C D, Lange R L, Priebe P P

机构信息

Department of Surgery, MetroHealth Medical Center, Case Western Reserve University, School of Medicine, Cleveland, Ohio 44109-1998, USA.

出版信息

Am Surg. 1997 Jul;63(7):646-51; discussion 651-2.

PMID:9202541
Abstract

Percutaneous tracheostomy was initiated as an alternative to open tracheostomy at our institution in December 1993. To assess safety, operative time, and cost, a comparative analysis of percutaneous and open tracheostomies was performed. A retrospective evaluation of all patients who underwent percutaneous tracheostomy (P) from December 1993 to March 1996 was completed. Patients were evaluated for indications for tracheostomy, length of operation, morbidity, and cost. The results were compared with patients who underwent open tracheostomy (O) during the 12 months prior to introduction of the percutaneous technique. Tracheostomy was performed percutaneously in 74 patients and by a standard open technique in 109 patients. Indications for tracheostomy included: chronic ventilator dependence (P, 49 vs O, 58); airway protection (P, 19 vs O, 42); laryngeal dysfunction (P, 2 vs O, 7); and facial trauma (P 6 vs O, 2). The length of operation was 21 +/- 6 minutes and 46 +/- 21 minutes for percutaneous and open tracheostomy, respectively (P < 0.05). Perioperative morbidity occurred in 2 patients (3%) following percutaneous tracheostomy compared to 10 patients (9%) following open tracheostomy (P > 0.05). The mean operating room costs per patient were $1093 and $1370 for percutaneous and open tracheostomy, respectively. Percutaneous tracheostomy is a safe procedure that can be performed in less time and at a lower cost than standard open tracheostomy.

摘要

1993年12月,我院开始采用经皮气管切开术作为开放性气管切开术的替代方法。为评估安全性、手术时间和成本,对经皮气管切开术和开放性气管切开术进行了对比分析。对1993年12月至1996年3月期间所有接受经皮气管切开术(P组)的患者进行了回顾性评估。评估患者的气管切开术指征、手术时长、发病率和成本。将结果与在经皮技术引入前12个月内接受开放性气管切开术(O组)的患者进行比较。74例患者接受了经皮气管切开术,109例患者接受了标准开放性气管切开术。气管切开术的指征包括:慢性呼吸机依赖(P组49例 vs O组58例);气道保护(P组19例 vs O组42例);喉功能障碍(P组2例 vs O组7例);以及面部创伤(P组6例 vs O组2例)。经皮气管切开术和开放性气管切开术的手术时长分别为21±6分钟和46±21分钟(P<0.05)。经皮气管切开术后2例患者(3%)发生围手术期并发症,而开放性气管切开术后有10例患者(9%)发生围手术期并发症(P>0.05)。经皮气管切开术和开放性气管切开术的每位患者平均手术室成本分别为1093美元和1370美元。经皮气管切开术是一种安全的手术,与标准开放性气管切开术相比,所需时间更短,成本更低。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验