Capel P, Arnout J, Cauchie P, Chatelain B, Criel A, David J L, Fondu P, Jochmans K, Lavenne E, Lust A, Van der Planken M
Hôpital Erasme, Université Libre de Bruxelles.
Acta Clin Belg. 1997;52(2):84-91. doi: 10.1080/17843286.1997.11718558.
Twenty-six plasma samples have been sent to 11 different Belgian laboratories in order to detect the presence of antiphospholipid antibodies, either by immunological methods and/or by coagulation tests. A good concordance between laboratories was observed for coagulation tests. Laboratories using detection tests and performing mixing procedures and neutralisation procedures displayed the highest sensitivity as compared with laboratories which did not perform one of these two latter procedures. The concordance between laboratories for the immunological methods was much worse as compared with coagulation tests. This may be attributable either to an intrinsic problem of the immunological tests or to a selection bias due the fact that the plasmas used in this study were selected in coagulation laboratories only where the chance to find a lupus anticoagulant positive/ELISA antiphospholipid negative sample is high.
26份血浆样本已被送往11个不同的比利时实验室,以便通过免疫学方法和/或凝血试验检测抗磷脂抗体的存在。各实验室在凝血试验方面表现出良好的一致性。与未进行后两种程序之一的实验室相比,使用检测试验并进行混合程序和中和程序的实验室显示出最高的灵敏度。与凝血试验相比,各实验室在免疫学方法方面的一致性要差得多。这可能归因于免疫学检测的内在问题,或者是由于本研究中使用的血浆仅在凝血实验室中选择,而在这些实验室中发现狼疮抗凝物阳性/ELISA抗磷脂阴性样本的机会很高,从而导致的选择偏倚。