Vagliasindi M
Instituto di Malattie dell' Apparato Respiratorio, Università degli Studi, Siena, Italy.
Int J Clin Pharmacol Ther. 1997 Jun;35(6):245-9.
We have conducted a trial according to double-blind, double-dummy conditions, comparing flurythromycin ethylsuccinate with clarithromycin treatments. Sensitive pathogenic bacteria were isolated according to the Kirby Bauer method from sputum cultures of 152 patients affected by acute infections of lower airways (bronchitis, bronchopneumonia, etc.). The activities of the 2 drugs were investigated on the basis of a main bacteriological evaluation and of several secondary criteria; the 2 treatments were effective and tolerated to the same extent. It can be concluded that in the treatment of infections of lower respiratory airways the use of flurythromycin offers some advantages.
我们按照双盲、双模拟条件进行了一项试验,比较琥乙红霉素与克拉霉素的治疗效果。采用柯氏琼脂扩散法从152例下呼吸道急性感染(支气管炎、支气管肺炎等)患者的痰培养物中分离出敏感病原菌。基于主要细菌学评估和若干次要标准对这两种药物的活性进行了研究;两种治疗方法的有效性和耐受性程度相同。可以得出结论,在治疗下呼吸道感染时,使用琥乙红霉素具有一些优势。