Suppr超能文献

头孢布烯与阿莫西林/克拉维酸治疗慢性支气管炎急性加重的比较。

Comparison of ceftibuten versus amoxicillin/clavulanate in the treatment of acute exacerbations of chronic bronchitis.

作者信息

Aubier M A

机构信息

Service de Pneumologie, Hôpital Bichat-Claude Bernard, Paris, France.

出版信息

Chemotherapy. 1997 Jul-Aug;43(4):297-302. doi: 10.1159/000239581.

Abstract

The efficacy and tolerability of once- or twice-daily ceftibuten (400 mg daily) were compared with three-times daily amoxicillin/clavulanate (AMX/CA, 500 mg/125 mg) in the treatment of acute exacerbations of chronic bronchitis (AECB) in an open, parallel-group 10- to 14-day study in 443 patients. Patients were assessed at baseline and on days 5, 10-14 and after 4-6 weeks of treatment, and the clinical response defined as cured, improved, stabilized or failed. Clinical efficacy between the 3 groups was equivalent (p = 0.002) with 90% of patients in each group responding to treatment (cured or improved) and the incidence of complete cures (with no clinical signs of relapse) was also equivalent. In conclusion, this study showed that ceftibuten is clinically equivalent to a standard regimen of amoxicillin/clavulanate in the treatment of AECB, including those patients infected with Streptococcus pneumonia. Ceftibuten was better tolerated than AMX/CA and was associated with significantly fewer gastrointestinal side effects. Furthermore, once-daily was a well tolerated and effective as twice-daily ceftibuten.

摘要

在一项针对443例患者的开放、平行组10至14天研究中,比较了每日一次或两次服用头孢布烯(每日400毫克)与每日三次服用阿莫西林/克拉维酸(AMX/CA,500毫克/125毫克)治疗慢性支气管炎急性加重期(AECB)的疗效和耐受性。在基线、治疗第5天、第10至14天以及治疗4至6周后对患者进行评估,临床反应定义为治愈、改善、稳定或失败。三组之间的临床疗效相当(p = 0.002),每组90%的患者对治疗有反应(治愈或改善),完全治愈(无复发临床体征)的发生率也相当。总之,本研究表明,在治疗AECB方面,头孢布烯在临床上等同于阿莫西林/克拉维酸的标准方案,包括感染肺炎链球菌的患者。头孢布烯的耐受性优于AMX/CA,胃肠道副作用明显较少。此外,每日一次服用头孢布烯的耐受性良好,与每日两次服用等效。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验