• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

儿童胰腺创伤的保守治疗

Conservative management of pancreatic trauma in children.

作者信息

Keller M S, Stafford P W, Vane D W

机构信息

Department of Surgery, Children's Hospital of Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA.

出版信息

J Trauma. 1997 Jun;42(6):1097-100. doi: 10.1097/00005373-199706000-00019.

DOI:10.1097/00005373-199706000-00019
PMID:9210548
Abstract

Many adults and most children with a solid-organ abdominal injury can be managed nonoperatively. To date, however, little is known about the outcome of nonoperative management of pancreatic injury. To analyze current treatment patterns of pancreatic injury in children, all children (age < 19 years) identified in the National Pediatric Trauma Registry (49,540 patients) and admitted to two level I pediatric trauma centers with a diagnosis of injury to the pancreas (International Classification of Disease-9 codes 863.81-863.84 and 863.91-863.94) were reviewed. Over a 7-year period, 154 children were identified with pancreatic injury. Thirty-one (20%) sustained severe injuries (grades III, IV, or V) and 123 (80%) sustained lower-grade injuries (grades I and II). Sixteen (52%) of the children sustaining grades III, IV, or V injury required pancreatic procedures (9 distal resections, 3 simple repairs, 2 enteric anastomoses, 2 others). Only 26 (21%) of the grades I and II injuries required surgical intervention specific to the pancreas (11 resections, 9 catheter drainage of pseudocysts, 2 enteric anastomoses, 4 others). Ninety-seven (79%) grades I and II injuries were successfully managed conservatively. Overall, 15 (10%) children required drainage procedures for pseudocyst. The frequency of operative intervention decreased during the last 4 years of the study (18 vs. 26%, p > 0.05), coinciding with a decrease in the frequency of drainage procedures for pseudocysts. The need for surgical intervention was not influenced by age, Injury Severity Score, or Pediatric Trauma Score (p > 0.05). Associated abdominal injuries were common but did not influence operations on the pancreas (p > 0.05). No deaths were attributed to the pancreatic injury. These data indicate that early intervention for pancreatic injury, in the absence of clinical deterioration or major ductal injury (grades III, IV, or V), is unwarranted, and careful observation may supplant the conventional surgical therapy recommended for adults.

摘要

许多患有腹部实体器官损伤的成年人和大多数儿童可以采用非手术治疗。然而,迄今为止,关于胰腺损伤非手术治疗的结果知之甚少。为了分析儿童胰腺损伤的当前治疗模式,我们回顾了国家儿科创伤登记处(49540例患者)中所有年龄小于19岁、并被两所一级儿科创伤中心收治且诊断为胰腺损伤(国际疾病分类-9编码863.81 - 863.84和863.91 - 863.94)的儿童。在7年期间,共识别出154例胰腺损伤儿童。其中31例(20%)为重伤(Ⅲ、Ⅳ或Ⅴ级),123例(80%)为轻伤(Ⅰ和Ⅱ级)。Ⅲ、Ⅳ或Ⅴ级损伤的儿童中有16例(52%)需要进行胰腺手术(9例远端切除术、3例单纯修补术、2例肠吻合术、2例其他手术)。Ⅰ和Ⅱ级损伤中只有26例(21%)需要针对胰腺进行手术干预(11例切除术、9例假性囊肿导管引流术、2例肠吻合术、4例其他手术)。97例(79%)Ⅰ和Ⅱ级损伤通过保守治疗成功处理。总体而言,15例(10%)儿童需要进行假性囊肿引流手术。在研究的最后4年中,手术干预的频率有所下降(18%对26%,p>0.05),这与假性囊肿引流手术频率的下降相吻合。手术干预的必要性不受年龄、损伤严重程度评分或儿科创伤评分的影响(p>0.05)。相关的腹部损伤很常见,但不影响胰腺手术(p>0.05)。没有死亡病例归因于胰腺损伤。这些数据表明,在没有临床病情恶化或主要导管损伤(Ⅲ、Ⅳ或Ⅴ级)的情况下,对胰腺损伤进行早期干预是不必要的,仔细观察可能会取代推荐给成年人的传统手术治疗方法。

相似文献

1
Conservative management of pancreatic trauma in children.儿童胰腺创伤的保守治疗
J Trauma. 1997 Jun;42(6):1097-100. doi: 10.1097/00005373-199706000-00019.
2
Management of pancreatic injury in pediatric blunt abdominal trauma.小儿钝性腹部创伤中胰腺损伤的处理
J Pediatr Surg. 1999 May;34(5):818-23; discussion 823-4. doi: 10.1016/s0022-3468(99)90379-2.
3
Contemporary management and outcomes of blunt traumatic American Association for the Surgery of Trauma Organ Injury Scale grades III and IV pancreatic injuries in children: A Trauma Quality Improvement Program analysis.当代儿童钝性创伤性美国外科创伤协会器官损伤分级 III 和 IV 级胰腺损伤的处理方法和结果:创伤质量改进计划分析。
J Trauma Acute Care Surg. 2024 Sep 1;97(3):365-370. doi: 10.1097/TA.0000000000004270. Epub 2024 Jan 29.
4
Pediatric pancreatic trauma: predictors of nonoperative management failure and associated outcomes.小儿胰腺创伤:非手术治疗失败的预测因素及相关结局
J Pediatr Surg. 2007 Feb;42(2):340-4. doi: 10.1016/j.jpedsurg.2006.10.006.
5
Management and outcomes of peripancreatic fluid collections and pseudocysts following non-operative management of pancreatic injuries in children.儿童胰腺损伤非手术治疗后胰周液体积聚和假性囊肿的管理及结局
Pediatr Surg Int. 2019 Aug;35(8):861-867. doi: 10.1007/s00383-019-04492-3. Epub 2019 Jun 3.
6
Initial resection of potentially viable tissue is not optimal treatment for grades II-IV pancreatic injuries.对于II-IV级胰腺损伤,初始切除可能存活的组织并非最佳治疗方法。
World J Surg. 2009 Feb;33(2):221-7. doi: 10.1007/s00268-008-9569-x.
7
An AAST-MITC analysis of pancreatic trauma: Staple or sew? Resect or drain?AAST-MITC 胰腺创伤分析:用钉合还是缝合?切除还是引流?
J Trauma Acute Care Surg. 2018 Sep;85(3):435-443. doi: 10.1097/TA.0000000000001987.
8
Image-guided prediction of pseudocyst formation in pediatric pancreatic trauma.小儿胰腺创伤中假性囊肿形成的影像引导预测
J Surg Res. 2015 Feb;193(2):513-8. doi: 10.1016/j.jss.2014.04.015. Epub 2014 Oct 7.
9
The management of pancreatic injuries in children: operate or observe.儿童胰腺损伤的处理:手术还是观察。
J Pediatr Surg. 2011 Jun;46(6):1140-3. doi: 10.1016/j.jpedsurg.2011.03.041.
10
Isolated pancreatic injuries: An analysis of 49 consecutive patients treated at a Level 1 Trauma Centre.孤立性胰腺损伤:对一家一级创伤中心连续治疗的49例患者的分析。
J Visc Surg. 2015 Dec;152(6):349-55. doi: 10.1016/j.jviscsurg.2015.09.010. Epub 2015 Oct 23.

引用本文的文献

1
Pancreatic and Duodenal Trauma in Children.儿童胰腺和十二指肠创伤
J Pediatr Intensive Care. 2015 Mar;4(1):21-26. doi: 10.1055/s-0035-1554985.
2
Blunt Trauma Pancreas in Children: Is Non-Operative Management Appropriate for All Grades?儿童钝性胰腺损伤:非手术治疗适用于所有分级吗?
Pediatr Gastroenterol Hepatol Nutr. 2017 Dec;20(4):252-258. doi: 10.5223/pghn.2017.20.4.252. Epub 2017 Dec 22.
3
Management of blunt pancreatic trauma in children: Review of the National Trauma Data Bank.儿童钝性胰腺创伤的管理:国家创伤数据库回顾
J Pediatr Surg. 2016 Sep;51(9):1526-31. doi: 10.1016/j.jpedsurg.2016.05.003. Epub 2016 May 31.
4
Management of blunt pancreatic trauma: what's new?钝性胰腺创伤的管理:有哪些新进展?
Eur J Trauma Emerg Surg. 2015 Jun;41(3):239-50. doi: 10.1007/s00068-015-0510-3. Epub 2015 Mar 17.
5
Multi-institutional experience with penetrating pancreatic injuries in children.
Pediatr Surg Int. 2014 Nov;30(11):1107-10. doi: 10.1007/s00383-014-3599-2. Epub 2014 Sep 21.
6
Non-operative versus operative treatment for blunt pancreatic trauma in children.儿童钝性胰腺创伤的非手术治疗与手术治疗
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2014 Feb 12;2014(2):CD009746. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD009746.pub2.
7
Management of blunt pancreatic trauma in children.儿童钝性胰腺创伤的管理
Pediatr Surg Int. 2013 Oct;29(10):1019-22. doi: 10.1007/s00383-013-3402-9.
8
Delayed presentation of complete pancreatic ductal transection in children: management of two cases without resection.儿童完全性胰管横断伤的延迟就诊:两例非手术治疗病例
Pediatr Surg Int. 2013 Apr;29(4):401-5. doi: 10.1007/s00383-012-3233-0. Epub 2012 Dec 16.
9
Blunt pancreatic trauma in children.儿童钝性胰腺创伤。
Surg Today. 2011 Jul;41(7):946-54. doi: 10.1007/s00595-010-4369-y. Epub 2011 Jul 12.
10
Is entirely conservative management a correct strategy for hemodynamically stable patient with a grade IV blunt pancreatic injury?
World J Surg. 2011 Apr;35(4):933-4; author reply 935-6. doi: 10.1007/s00268-010-0925-2.