Baker J T, Bell J D, Murphy P T
Australian Institute of Marine Science, Townsville MC, Australia.
J Ethnopharmacol. 1996 Apr;51(1-3):229-35; discussion 235-7. doi: 10.1016/0378-8741(95)01366-0.
The predominantly developed country business principle that the natural resource is effectively free, or of very low monetary value, has been significantly challenged in recent years, not only through the recognition of the accelerated rate of depletion of native forest resources and of the space and food demands of increasing populations, but also through international conventions which deal with a wide range of topics from the rights of indigenous people to the Law of the Sea Convention. Australia, classified as a developed country, but located in a geographic region of many developing countries, has, in the past 25 years, demonstrated particular concern for the rights of the people of those countries, as well as for the rights of indigenous people of Australia. The practical international aspects were clearly exemplified in the time, from 1985, when the Australian Institute of Marine Science (AIMS) negotiated, within the National Cancer Institute (NCI) contract, that collections of biological samples in developing countries would be accompanied by an agreement to provide benefits arising from field work, and from any commercial product developments, to those countries. Australia, as a signatory to the Convention on Biological Diversity (Appendix I), continues to analyze the challenge presented by the need to freely exchange genetic resources of common value, e.g. food crops, while insuring an appropriate reward to developing and developed countries, should discoveries be made from their biological resources, which lead directly or indirectly, to high value commercial non-food products. The Prime Minister's Coordinating Committee on Science and Technology established a special working group to recommend on access to Australia's biodiversity. The report arising from the study, and other related issues, are discussed.
发达国家盛行的商业原则认为自然资源实际上是免费的,或者货币价值极低,近年来这一原则受到了重大挑战。这不仅是因为人们认识到原生森林资源的枯竭速度加快,以及不断增长的人口对空间和食物的需求,还因为国际公约涉及从土著人民权利到《海洋法公约》等广泛议题。澳大利亚虽被归类为发达国家,但位于众多发展中国家所在的地理区域,在过去25年里,对这些国家人民的权利以及澳大利亚土著人民的权利表现出了特别关注。实际的国际层面在1985年之后的一段时间里得到了清晰体现,当时澳大利亚海洋科学研究所(AIMS)在与美国国立癌症研究所(NCI)的合同谈判中商定,在发展中国家采集生物样本时,将达成一项协议,把实地工作以及任何商业产品开发所产生的利益提供给这些国家。澳大利亚作为《生物多样性公约》(附录一)的签署国,继续分析在自由交换具有共同价值的遗传资源(如粮食作物)时所面临的挑战,同时确保如果利用其生物资源直接或间接发现了高价值商业非食品产品,应给予发展中国家和发达国家适当的回报。总理科学技术协调委员会成立了一个特别工作组,就获取澳大利亚生物多样性的问题提出建议。文中讨论了该研究产生的报告以及其他相关问题。