• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

[埃贝尔托夫特健康项目:全科医疗中的健康检查与讨论。一项为期5年的前瞻性随机对照人群研究的基础数据]

[The health project Ebeltoft: health check ups and discussions in general practice. Basic data from a 5-year, prospective, randomized, controlled population study].

作者信息

Lauritzen T, Nielsen K D, Leboeuf-Yde C, Lunde I M

机构信息

Aarhus Universitet, Institut for Almen Medicin og Sundhedeprojekt Ebeltoft.

出版信息

Ugeskr Laeger. 1997 Jun 16;159(25):3940-6.

PMID:9214067
Abstract

A study was carried out to investigate people's interest in participating in health check-up and in discussions about health with their own general practitioner, participants' health status, the proportion who received health advice following health check-up, and the lifestyle goals they set following discussion with their general practitioner. This study reports the baseline data from a five-year randomized, controlled, prospective, population-based study in general practices in Ebeltoft, Denmark. All general practitioners from the four practices in Ebeltoft and a random sample of 2,000 people aged between 30 and 50 years were invited to participate. Participants were randomly divided into three groups-one control group and two intervention groups. One intervention group was given a health check-up which included a range og tests (Table 2 and 3); this group received written feedback from the general practitioner. The other intervention group was also given a health check-up and written feedback, in addition, they were given the opportunity to attend their general practitioner to discuss health-promoting measures. A total of 1370 people participated in the study (69% response rate). Health advice was given to 76% of 905 participants following health check-up. Almost all of the 456 participants (96%) who were offered the opportunity of discussing their health with their general practitioner took up the offer: 64% of the 456 participants reported that they had decided to undertake lifestyle changes. Eleven of those who discussed their health with the doctor were referred to a specialist (2%). There was considerable interest in participating in health promotion. Three out of four of those who had a health check-up were given health advice. Two out of three of those who were offered a health talk with the general practitioner appeared willing to make relevant lifestyle changes. Longterm follow up is needed to determine effects and side effects of health check-up and health talks.

摘要

开展了一项研究,以调查人们参与健康检查以及与自己的全科医生讨论健康问题的兴趣、参与者的健康状况、健康检查后接受健康建议的比例,以及他们在与全科医生讨论后设定的生活方式目标。本研究报告了丹麦埃贝尔托夫地区普通诊所进行的一项为期五年的随机、对照、前瞻性、基于人群的研究的基线数据。邀请了埃贝尔托夫地区四家诊所的所有全科医生以及2000名年龄在30至50岁之间的随机抽样人群参与。参与者被随机分为三组——一组对照组和两组干预组。一组干预组接受了包括一系列检查(表2和表3)的健康检查;该组收到了全科医生的书面反馈。另一组干预组同样接受了健康检查和书面反馈,此外,他们还有机会与全科医生讨论促进健康的措施。共有1370人参与了该研究(应答率为69%)。905名参与者在健康检查后,76%的人得到了健康建议。在被提供与全科医生讨论健康问题机会的456名参与者中,几乎所有人(96%)都接受了邀请:456名参与者中有64%表示他们已决定改变生活方式。在与医生讨论健康问题的人中,有11人被转诊至专科医生处(2%)。人们对参与健康促进有相当浓厚的兴趣。接受健康检查的人中,四分之三得到了健康建议。在被提供与全科医生进行健康谈话机会的人中,三分之二似乎愿意做出相关的生活方式改变。需要进行长期随访以确定健康检查和健康谈话的效果及副作用。

相似文献

1
[The health project Ebeltoft: health check ups and discussions in general practice. Basic data from a 5-year, prospective, randomized, controlled population study].[埃贝尔托夫特健康项目:全科医疗中的健康检查与讨论。一项为期5年的前瞻性随机对照人群研究的基础数据]
Ugeskr Laeger. 1997 Jun 16;159(25):3940-6.
2
Ebeltoft project: baseline data from a five-year randomized, controlled, prospective health promotion study in a Danish population.埃伯尔措夫特项目:丹麦人群中一项为期五年的随机、对照、前瞻性健康促进研究的基线数据。
Br J Gen Pract. 1995 Oct;45(399):542-7.
3
[Can systematic general health screening and patient-physician health discussions improve the cardiovascular profile of the population? A randomized controlled trial in general practice with a 5-year follow-up].[系统的全面健康筛查和医患健康讨论能否改善人群的心血管状况?一项在全科医疗中进行的为期5年随访的随机对照试验]
Ugeskr Laeger. 2002 Jun 17;164(25):3354-60.
4
General health screenings to improve cardiovascular risk profiles: a randomized controlled trial in general practice with 5-year follow-up.通过一般健康筛查改善心血管风险状况:一项在全科医疗中进行的随机对照试验及5年随访
J Fam Pract. 2002 Jun;51(6):546-52.
5
Secondary healthcare contacts after multiphasic preventive health screening: a randomized trial.多阶段预防性健康筛查后的二级医疗保健接触:一项随机试验。
Scand J Public Health. 2006;34(3):254-61. doi: 10.1080/14034940500307564.
6
Health tests and health consultations reduced cardiovascular risk without psychological strain, increased healthcare utilization or increased costs. An overview of the results from a 5-year randomized trial in primary care. The Ebeltoft Health Promotion Project (EHPP).健康测试与健康咨询降低了心血管风险,且未造成心理压力,未增加医疗保健利用率或成本。一项在初级保健领域进行的为期5年的随机试验结果概述。埃伯尔托夫特健康促进项目(EHPP)。
Scand J Public Health. 2008 Aug;36(6):650-61. doi: 10.1177/1403494807090165.
7
Perspectives on lifestyle intervention: the views of general practitioners who have taken part in a health promotion study.生活方式干预的观点:参与健康促进研究的全科医生的看法。
Scand J Public Health. 2005;33(1):4-10. doi: 10.1080/14034940410028181.
8
Preventive health screenings and health consultations in primary care increase life expectancy without increasing costs.初级保健中的预防性健康筛查和健康咨询可提高预期寿命,且不会增加成本。
Scand J Public Health. 2007;35(4):365-72. doi: 10.1080/14034940701219642.
9
A randomised controlled trial of screening for adult hearing loss during preventive health checks.一项在预防性健康检查期间筛查成人听力损失的随机对照试验。
Br J Gen Pract. 2001 May;51(466):351-5.
10
Who should give lifestyle advice in general practice and what factors influence attendance at health promotion clinics? Survey of patients' views.在全科医疗中应由谁提供生活方式建议,以及哪些因素会影响人们前往健康促进诊所就诊?患者观点调查。
Br J Gen Pract. 1995 Dec;45(401):669-71.

引用本文的文献

1
General health checks in adults for reducing morbidity and mortality from disease.成人进行一般健康检查以降低疾病的发病率和死亡率。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2019 Jan 31;1(1):CD009009. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD009009.pub3.