Kraus J F, Gardner L, Collins J, Sorock G, Volinn E
UCLA, School of Public Health, Department of Epidemiology 90095-1772, USA.
Am J Ind Med. 1997 Aug;32(2):153-63. doi: 10.1002/(sici)1097-0274(199708)32:2<153::aid-ajim6>3.0.co;2-#.
The connection between work-related exposures and the onset of back injury or pain is complex and not clearly understood. This paper raises design issues related to the planning and conduct of cohort studies of industrial low back pain (or injury)(LBP), with care given to definition and measurement of exposure and outcome events. These issues include sample size, outcome definition, study biases, and practical considerations when seeking and maintaining company collaboration with a research effort. Without resolving these issues, the authors conclude: (1) cohort studies of worksite-based LBP are needed to elucidate the causal associations between work tasks and LBP onset, (2) both acute and cumulative exposures should be assessed as risk factors for low back injury or pain, and (3) attention should be paid to the planning of such studies and minimization of potential biases that can limit the validity of the results. These design issues will benefit researchers and companies engaged in the planning and conduct of cohort studies of industrial LBP.
与工作相关的暴露因素与背部损伤或疼痛发作之间的联系很复杂,尚未被完全理解。本文提出了与工业性腰痛(或损伤)(LBP)队列研究的规划和实施相关的设计问题,同时关注暴露因素和结局事件的定义与测量。这些问题包括样本量、结局定义、研究偏倚,以及在寻求并维持公司与研究工作的合作时的实际考量。在未解决这些问题的情况下,作者得出结论:(1)需要开展基于工作场所的LBP队列研究,以阐明工作任务与LBP发作之间的因果关联;(2)急性暴露和累积暴露均应作为下背部损伤或疼痛的风险因素进行评估;(3)应重视此类研究的规划,并尽量减少可能限制结果有效性的潜在偏倚。这些设计问题将使从事工业性LBP队列研究规划和实施的研究人员和公司受益。