Baigent M F, Lloyd C J, Kavanagh S J, Ben-Tovim D I, Yellowlees P M, Kalucy R S, Bond M J
Department of Psychiatry, Flinders Medical Centre, South Australia, North Adelaide.
J Telemed Telecare. 1997;3 Suppl 1:3-5. doi: 10.1258/1357633971930346.
To investigate what is lost or gained in a psychiatric evaluation when it takes place via telepsychiatry we compared the interrater reliability between two psychiatrists interviewing 63 subjects in an observer/interviewer split configuration in telepsychiatry and same-room settings. The measures used were the BPRS and interviewer ratings from a semi-structured interview. Patients also rated their experience. There were some clear differences between the telepsychiatry and same-room evaluations. Despite these variations, diagnoses were as reliably made by telepsychiatry. Patient acceptance of telepsychiatry was high.
为了研究通过远程精神病学进行精神病评估时会失去或获得什么,我们比较了两位精神科医生在远程精神病学和同室环境中以观察者/访谈者分开配置对63名受试者进行访谈时的评分者间信度。使用的测量方法是简明精神病评定量表(BPRS)和来自半结构化访谈的访谈者评分。患者也对他们的体验进行了评分。远程精神病学评估和同室评估之间存在一些明显差异。尽管存在这些差异,但通过远程精神病学仍能可靠地做出诊断。患者对远程精神病学的接受度很高。