Baer L, Elford D R, Cukor P
Department of Psychiatry, Massachusetts General Hospital, Charlestown 02129, USA.
Harv Rev Psychiatry. 1997 May-Jun;5(1):7-17. doi: 10.3109/10673229709034720.
We examined all articles describing video applications of telemedicine for psychiatry (i.e., "telepsychiatry") that have been published in peer-reviewed journals. We found three reports of video application to continuing education, eight uncontrolled studies or anecdotal clinical reports of video application to assessment or consultation, five clinical investigations including a control group or control condition, three studies evaluating the reliability of administering psychological rating scales by video, and two studies of the cost-effectiveness of telepsychiatry. Although the conclusions of all studies reviewed recommended the use of telepsychiatry, evidence currently available is insufficient to suggest its widespread implementation. Additional studies are needed to determine when and for what age groups and conditions telepsychiatry is an effective way to deliver psychiatric services, and whether it is cost-effective. We recommend that telepsychiatry be employed on a limited basis and be restricted to research settings and underserved communities (where it may be the only option) until further evidence is available.
我们查阅了所有发表在同行评审期刊上的、描述远程医疗在精神病学领域视频应用(即“远程精神病学”)的文章。我们发现了3篇关于视频应用于继续教育的报告、8篇关于视频应用于评估或咨询的非对照研究或轶事临床报告、5项包含对照组或对照条件的临床研究、3项评估通过视频实施心理评定量表可靠性的研究,以及2项关于远程精神病学成本效益的研究。尽管所有综述研究的结论都推荐使用远程精神病学,但目前可得的证据不足以支持其广泛应用。还需要更多研究来确定远程精神病学在何时、针对哪些年龄组和病症是提供精神科服务的有效方式,以及它是否具有成本效益。我们建议在有更多证据之前,远程精神病学应在有限范围内使用,并限于研究环境和服务不足的社区(在这些社区它可能是唯一选择)。