Suppr超能文献

The early amniocentesis study: a randomized clinical trial of early amniocentesis and midtrimester amniocentesis. II. Evaluation of procedure details and neonatal congenital anomalies.

作者信息

Wilson R D, Johnson J, Windrim R, Dansereau J, Singer J, Winsor E J, Kalousek D

机构信息

Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, Canada.

出版信息

Fetal Diagn Ther. 1997 Mar-Apr;12(2):97-101. doi: 10.1159/000264440.

Abstract

The present study provides detailed neonatal and congenital malformation follow-up from 695 women enrolled in a prospective randomized multicenter study comparing the safety and accuracy of early (11-12 weeks of gestation) and midtrimester amniocentesis (15-16 weeks of gestation). No differences were found for total pregnancy loss (difference 0.4%; CI -3.6 to 4.4%), obstetrical or neonatal outcome. The incidence of congenital anomalies was 2.4 and 2.6% for the early amniocentesis and midtrimester amniocentesis groups, respectively. Respiratory problems were present in 2.1 and 1.6%, respectively. Musculoskeletal problems were present in 0.9 and 2.4%, respectively. It must be emphasized that before early amniocentesis can be considered as an alternative to midtrimester amniocentesis or chorionic villus sampling, careful evaluation of any fetal effects must be considered and further large randomized trials are necessary.

摘要

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验