• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

身体部位作为肢体失用症中工具性错误的意义。

The significance of body part as tool errors in limb apraxia.

作者信息

Raymer A M, Maher L M, Foundas A L, Heilman K M, Rothi L J

机构信息

Department of Child Study and Special Education, Old Dominion University, Norfolk, VA 23529-0136, USA.

出版信息

Brain Cogn. 1997 Jul;34(2):287-92. doi: 10.1006/brcg.1997.0919.

DOI:10.1006/brcg.1997.0919
PMID:9220091
Abstract

When pantomiming to command, individuals with left hemisphere brain damage (LBD) often produce errors in which they use a body part as if it were the tool (BPT). Some clinicians question the significance of this type of error because subjects without brain damage at times also make BPT responses. We analyzed BPT errors in LBD and normal subjects who were reinstructed to modify the inappropriate BPT responses when they occurred. We also analyzed errors in normal subjects who were never reinstructed if a BPT occurred. Whereas LBD subjects who were reinstructed produced significantly more BPT errors than normals who were also reinstructed, LBD subjects were not different from normals who were not reinstructed. When reinstructed, normal control subjects correctly modified virtually all BPT errors, whereas LBD subjects did not modify BPT errors. These findings underscore the need for reinstruction when a BPT error occurs to determine whether it represents a true BPT error, a sign of limb apraxia.

摘要

在通过手势示意来发指令时,左半球脑损伤(LBD)患者常常会出现错误,即他们会将身体部位当作工具来使用(身体部位-工具混淆,BPT)。一些临床医生质疑这类错误的重要性,因为没有脑损伤的受试者有时也会做出身体部位-工具混淆的反应。我们分析了LBD患者和正常受试者在出现不恰当的身体部位-工具混淆反应时被重新指导去改正这些反应的情况。我们还分析了那些即使出现身体部位-工具混淆情况也从未被重新指导的正常受试者的错误。虽然被重新指导的LBD患者比同样被重新指导的正常受试者产生了显著更多的身体部位-工具混淆错误,但LBD患者与未被重新指导的正常受试者并无差异。当被重新指导时,正常对照受试者几乎能正确改正所有身体部位-工具混淆错误,而LBD患者则不能改正身体部位-工具混淆错误。这些发现强调了在出现身体部位-工具混淆错误时进行重新指导的必要性,以确定它是否代表真正的身体部位-工具混淆错误,即肢体失用症的一种表现。

相似文献

1
The significance of body part as tool errors in limb apraxia.身体部位作为肢体失用症中工具性错误的意义。
Brain Cogn. 1997 Jul;34(2):287-92. doi: 10.1006/brcg.1997.0919.
2
Ecological implications of limb apraxia: evidence from mealtime behavior.
J Int Neuropsychol Soc. 1995 Jan;1(1):62-6. doi: 10.1017/s1355617700000114.
3
Ideomotor apraxia: behavioral dimensions and neuroanatomical basis.观念运动性失用症:行为维度与神经解剖学基础。
Brain Lang. 1997 Jun 1;58(1):125-36. doi: 10.1006/brln.1997.1770.
4
Ideomotor apraxia in Alzheimer disease and left hemisphere stroke: limb transitive and intransitive movements.阿尔茨海默病和左半球中风中的观念运动性失用症:肢体传递性和非传递性运动
Neuropsychiatry Neuropsychol Behav Neurol. 1999 Jul;12(3):161-6.
5
Motor performance in aphasia and ideomotor apraxia.失语症和观念运动性失用症中的运动表现。
Percept Mot Skills. 1994 Oct;79(2):719-22. doi: 10.2466/pms.1994.79.2.719.
6
A case of ideational apraxia with impairment of object use and preservation of object pantomime.一例观念性失用症患者,存在物品使用障碍但物品模仿动作保留。
Cortex. 1994 Mar;30(1):167-70. doi: 10.1016/s0010-9452(13)80332-2.
7
Hemispheric contributions to drawing.大脑半球对绘画的贡献。
Neuropsychologia. 1989;27(6):881-6. doi: 10.1016/0028-3932(89)90011-0.
8
The different types of limb apraxia errors made by patients with left vs. right hemisphere damage.左半球与右半球受损患者所犯不同类型的肢体失用错误。
Brain Cogn. 1984 Oct;3(4):370-84. doi: 10.1016/0278-2626(84)90029-0.
9
One hand is better than two: motor extinction of left hand advantage in unilateral neglect.单手优于双手:单侧忽视中左手优势的运动消退
Neuropsychologia. 1994 Jan;32(1):1-11. doi: 10.1016/0028-3932(94)90064-7.
10
Alien hand syndrome: influence of neglect on the clinical presentation of frontal and callosal variants.异己手综合征:忽视对额叶和胼胝体变异型临床表现的影响。
Cortex. 1997 Jun;33(2):287-99. doi: 10.1016/s0010-9452(08)70005-4.

引用本文的文献

1
The "What" and "How" of Pantomime Actions.哑剧动作的“是什么”与“怎么做”。
Vision (Basel). 2024 Sep 26;8(4):58. doi: 10.3390/vision8040058.
2
fNIRS-Based Differences in Cortical Activation during Tool Use, Pantomimed Actions, and Meaningless Actions between Children with and without Autism Spectrum Disorder (ASD).基于功能近红外光谱技术(fNIRS)的自闭症谱系障碍(ASD)患儿与非ASD患儿在工具使用、动作模仿和无意义动作过程中大脑皮层激活的差异
Brain Sci. 2023 May 29;13(6):876. doi: 10.3390/brainsci13060876.
3
Pantomime of tool use: looking beyond apraxia.
工具使用的手势模仿:超越失用症
Brain Commun. 2021 Oct 30;3(4):fcab263. doi: 10.1093/braincomms/fcab263. eCollection 2021.
4
Action performance in children with autism spectrum disorder at preschool age: a pilot study.学龄前自闭症谱系障碍儿童的动作表现:一项初步研究。
Int J Dev Disabil. 2019 Mar 4;66(4):289-295. doi: 10.1080/20473869.2019.1580472.
5
Gesture deficits and apraxia in schizophrenia.精神分裂症中的手势缺陷与失用症
Cortex. 2020 Dec;133:65-75. doi: 10.1016/j.cortex.2020.09.017. Epub 2020 Oct 3.
6
Limb Apraxia: a Disorder of Learned Skilled Movement.肢体失用症:一种习得性技能运动障碍。
Curr Neurol Neurosci Rep. 2019 Nov 12;19(10):82. doi: 10.1007/s11910-019-0989-9.
7
Reviewing the limb apraxia concept: From definition to cognitive neuropsychological models.回顾肢体失用症概念:从定义到认知神经心理学模型。
Dement Neuropsychol. 2010 Jul-Sep;4(3):165-172. doi: 10.1590/S1980-57642010DN40300004.
8
Praxis and writing in a right-hander with crossed aphasia.一名右利手伴交叉性失语患者的实践与书写情况
Neurocase. 2014 Jun;20(3):317-27. doi: 10.1080/13554794.2013.770883. Epub 2013 Apr 5.
9
The function of the left anterior temporal pole: evidence from acute stroke and infarct volume.左前颞极的功能:来自急性中风和梗死体积的证据。
Brain. 2011 Oct;134(Pt 10):3094-105. doi: 10.1093/brain/awr050. Epub 2011 Jun 17.
10
[Apraxia--neuroscience and clinical aspects. A literature synthesis].[失用症——神经科学与临床方面。文献综述]
Nervenarzt. 2005 Oct;76(10):1209-10, 1213-4, 1216-8, 1220-1. doi: 10.1007/s00115-005-1936-3.