Hoffman B F
North York General Hospital, Ontario.
Can J Psychiatry. 1997 Jun;42(5):497-501. doi: 10.1177/070674379704200506.
To outline how a psychiatric expert can do an impartial assessment and medicolegal report and then give an effective presentation in court that can sustain cross-examination.
The legal principles of litigating emotional trauma are reviewed, including proving causation, characterizing emotional suffering, assessing disability, and determining a realistic prognosis.
Psychiatrists must understand the interplay of legal and psychiatric principles when they are asked to assess litigants who are suing for monetary compensation for a widening range of emotional injuries resulting from motor vehicle accidents, slips and falls, incest and sexual abuse of children, discrimination, unlawful dismissal, malpractice, human-made disasters, product liability, and intentional torts, to name a few.
The psychiatrist can prepare his or her attitude, knowledge, and skills to give a presentation in court that will be credible, trustworthy, and dynamic. With adequate preparation, the psychiatric expert can bring an informed psychiatric perspective to the court that will have a significant impact on the outcome of the judicial deliberations.
概述精神科专家如何进行公正的评估并撰写法医学报告,然后在法庭上进行有效的陈述,以经受住交叉询问。
回顾了就情感创伤提起诉讼的法律原则,包括证明因果关系、描述情感痛苦、评估残疾情况以及确定现实的预后。
当精神科医生被要求评估因机动车事故、滑倒和跌倒、乱伦和儿童性虐待、歧视、非法解雇、医疗事故、人为灾难、产品责任和故意侵权等多种情感伤害而起诉要求金钱赔偿的诉讼当事人时,他们必须理解法律原则与精神科原则之间的相互作用。
精神科医生可以准备好自己的态度、知识和技能,以便在法庭上进行可信、可靠且有活力的陈述。通过充分的准备,精神科专家可以为法庭带来明智的精神科观点,这将对司法审议的结果产生重大影响。