• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

Valsartan, a new angiotensin II antagonist: antihypertensive effects over 24 hours.

作者信息

Neutel J, Weber M, Pool J, Smith D, Fitzsimmons S, Chiang Y T, Gatlin M

机构信息

Orange County Heart Institute and Research Center, California, USA.

出版信息

Clin Ther. 1997 May-Jun;19(3):447-58; discussion 367-8. doi: 10.1016/s0149-2918(97)80129-4.

DOI:10.1016/s0149-2918(97)80129-4
PMID:9220209
Abstract

This study was done to assess the antihypertensive efficacy of once-daily valsartan 20 mg, 80 mg, 160 mg, and 320 mg over 24 hours using ambulatory blood pressure monitoring (ABPM). A total of 217 adult outpatients with uncomplicated essential hypertension (office mean sitting diastolic blood pressure [DBP] of > or = 95 to < or = 115 mm Hg) participated in this multicenter, double-masked, placebo-controlled study. Patients were randomized to receive valsartan 20 mg, 80 mg, 160 mg, 320 mg, or placebo for 8 weeks. Twenty-four-hour ABPM was done at baseline and after 8 weeks of treatment. All valsartan doses produced significant decreases in average ambulatory systolic blood pressure (SBP) and DBP over 24 hours compared with placebo. A trend to greater reductions compared with placebo was observed for doses of valsartan 80 mg and greater (80 mg, -6.61 mm Hg DBP, -11.04 mm Hg SBP; 160 mg, -5.51 mm Hg DBP, -10.61 mm Hg SBP; 320 mg, -8.44 mm Hg DBP, -14.34 mm Hg SBP) compared with valsartan 20 mg (-3.52 mm Hg DBP, -5.92 mm Hg SBP). Valsartan produced consistent reductions compared with placebo during both day (> 6 AM to < or = 10 PM) and night (> 10 PM to < or = 6 AM). However, in all groups, the circadian pattern of blood pressure over 24 hours was preserved and was similar to that observed at baseline (but shifted into the normotensive range in a parallel fashion). The data show that single daily doses of valsartan 80 mg and greater provide effective control of both DBP and SBP over a 24-hour period without loss of diurnal variation.

摘要

相似文献

1
Valsartan, a new angiotensin II antagonist: antihypertensive effects over 24 hours.
Clin Ther. 1997 May-Jun;19(3):447-58; discussion 367-8. doi: 10.1016/s0149-2918(97)80129-4.
2
Use of 24-hour ambulatory blood pressure monitoring to assess antihypertensive efficacy: a comparison of olmesartan medoxomil, losartan potassium, valsartan, and irbesartan.使用24小时动态血压监测评估降压疗效:奥美沙坦酯、氯沙坦钾、缬沙坦和厄贝沙坦的比较
Am J Cardiovasc Drugs. 2005;5(1):41-50. doi: 10.2165/00129784-200505010-00006.
3
Ambulatory blood pressure response to once-daily fimasartan: an 8-week, multicenter, randomized, double-blind, active-comparator, parallel-group study in Korean patients with mild to moderate essential hypertension.每日一次非那沙坦的动态血压反应:一项为期 8 周、多中心、随机、双盲、阳性对照、平行分组研究,纳入韩国轻至中度原发性高血压患者。
Clin Ther. 2013 Sep;35(9):1337-49. doi: 10.1016/j.clinthera.2013.06.021. Epub 2013 Aug 7.
4
Ambulatory versus clinic blood pressure for the assessment of anti hypertensive efficacy in clinical trials: insights from the Val-Syst Study.动态血压与诊室血压用于评估临床试验中抗高血压疗效:来自Val-Syst研究的见解
Clin Ther. 2004 Sep;26(9):1436-45. doi: 10.1016/j.clinthera.2004.09.003.
5
An ambulatory blood pressure monitoring study of the comparative antihypertensive efficacy of two angiotensin II receptor antagonists, irbesartan and valsartan.一项关于两种血管紧张素 II 受体拮抗剂(厄贝沙坦和缬沙坦)降压疗效比较的动态血压监测研究。
Blood Press Monit. 2002 Apr;7(2):135-42. doi: 10.1097/00126097-200204000-00008.
6
Efficacy of valsartan in patients aged > or =65 years with systolic hypertension.缬沙坦对年龄≥65岁的收缩期高血压患者的疗效。
Clin Ther. 2000 Aug;22(8):961-9. doi: 10.1016/s0149-2918(00)80067-3.
7
Sustained antihypertensive activity of telmisartan compared with valsartan.与缬沙坦相比,替米沙坦具有持续的降压活性。
Blood Press Monit. 2004 Aug;9(4):203-10. doi: 10.1097/00126097-200408000-00005.
8
Antihypertensive efficacy and tolerability of two fixed-dose combinations of valsartan and hydrochlorothiazide compared with valsartan monotherapy in patients with stage 2 or 3 systolic hypertension: an 8-week, randomized, double-blind, parallel-group trial.缬沙坦与氢氯噻嗪两种固定剂量复方制剂与缬沙坦单药治疗对2或3期收缩期高血压患者的降压疗效及耐受性比较:一项为期8周的随机、双盲、平行组试验
Clin Ther. 2005 Jul;27(7):1013-21. doi: 10.1016/j.clinthera.2005.07.010.
9
Efficacy and tolerability of combination therapy with valsartan plus hydrochlorothiazide compared with amlodipine monotherapy in hypertensive patients with other cardiovascular risk factors: the VAST study.缬沙坦联合氢氯噻嗪与氨氯地平单药治疗对伴有其他心血管危险因素的高血压患者的疗效及耐受性比较:VAST研究
Clin Ther. 2005 May;27(5):578-87. doi: 10.1016/j.clinthera.2005.05.006.
10
Effects of combination olmesartan medoxomil plus azelnidipine versus monotherapy with either agent on 24-hour ambulatory blood pressure and pulse rate in Japanese patients with essential hypertension: additional results from the REZALT study.奥美沙坦酯与阿折地平联合治疗与单药治疗对日本原发性高血压患者 24 小时动态血压和脉搏率的影响:REZALT 研究的附加结果。
Clin Ther. 2010 May;32(5):861-81. doi: 10.1016/j.clinthera.2010.04.020.

引用本文的文献

1
Efficacy of angiotensin receptor blockers for nocturnal blood pressure reduction: a systematic review and meta-analysis.血管紧张素受体阻滞剂降低夜间血压的疗效:系统评价和荟萃分析。
Ann Med. 2024 Dec;56(1):2362880. doi: 10.1080/07853890.2024.2362880. Epub 2024 Jun 3.
2
Indoxyl sulfate impairs valsartan-induced neovascularization.硫酸吲哚酚可损害缬沙坦诱导的血管新生。
Redox Biol. 2020 Feb;30:101433. doi: 10.1016/j.redox.2020.101433. Epub 2020 Jan 14.
3
Time of administration important? Morning versus evening dosing of valsartan.
给药时间重要吗?缬沙坦早晨给药与晚上给药的对比。
J Hypertens. 2015 Feb;33(2):385-92. doi: 10.1097/HJH.0000000000000397.
4
Comprehensive overview: efficacy, tolerability, and cost-effectiveness of irbesartan.全面概述:厄贝沙坦的疗效、耐受性及成本效益
Vasc Health Risk Manag. 2013;9:575-92. doi: 10.2147/VHRM.S50831. Epub 2013 Oct 7.
5
Antihypertensive efficacy of angiotensin receptor blockers as monotherapy as evaluated by ambulatory blood pressure monitoring: a meta-analysis.通过动态血压监测评估血管紧张素受体阻滞剂作为单一疗法的降压疗效:一项荟萃分析。
Eur Heart J. 2014 Jul;35(26):1732-42. doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/eht333. Epub 2013 Aug 21.
6
Valsartan: more than a decade of experience.缬沙坦:十余年的经验。
Drugs. 2009;69(17):2393-414. doi: 10.2165/11319460-000000000-00000.
7
Blood pressure lowering efficacy of angiotensin receptor blockers for primary hypertension.血管紧张素受体阻滞剂对原发性高血压的降压疗效。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2008 Oct 8;2008(4):CD003822. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD003822.pub2.
8
Updated meta-analytical approach to the efficacy of antihypertensive drugs in reducing blood pressure.抗高血压药物降低血压疗效的更新荟萃分析方法
Clin Drug Investig. 2007;27(11):735-53. doi: 10.2165/00044011-200727110-00001.
9
Comparison of telmisartan vs. valsartan in the treatment of mild to moderate hypertension using ambulatory blood pressure monitoring.使用动态血压监测比较替米沙坦与缬沙坦治疗轻至中度高血压的疗效
J Clin Hypertens (Greenwich). 2002 Jul-Aug;4(4 Suppl 1):26-31. doi: 10.1111/j.1524-6175.2002.01586.x.
10
Psychological characteristics and responses to antihypertensive drug therapy.心理特征及对抗高血压药物治疗的反应。
J Clin Hypertens (Greenwich). 2002 Jan-Feb;4(1):25-34. doi: 10.1111/j.1524-6175.2002.00493.x.