Vanderpooten A, Goddeeris B, De Roose P, Hendrickx L, Biront P, Desmettre P
Immunology of Domestic Animals, Katholieke Universiteit Leuven, Heverlee, Belgium.
Vet Microbiol. 1997 Apr;55(1-4):81-9. doi: 10.1016/s0378-1135(96)01300-4.
A comparative evaluation of vaccination methods with glycoproteins for the induction of immune responses and protection of the pig against Aujeszky's disease virus (ADV) was performed. Different vaccination routes (intradermal (i.d.) versus intramuscular (i.m.)), inoculation sites (the neck versus the back) and number of inoculation points (2 versus 6) per site were compared. Body weight (BW) changes and viral excretion after challenge were compared with virus-neutralizing titers, antigen-specific IgG and IgA responses in serum and virus-specific lymphoproliferative responses in peripheral blood during the immunisation period. According to BW changes better protection was obtained with six-point than two-point i.d. injections. i.d. vaccination in the back at six points gave similar results as i.m. vaccination in the neck but appeared inferior in the reduction of virus excretion. Regarding the immunological parameters, the virus-specific IgA response in serum gave the best indication for protection. It can be concluded that according to BW changes, six-point i.d. immunisation in the back and i.m. immunisation in the neck provided the best protection and that six-point i.d. injections resulted in a better vaccination than two-point i.d. injections.
对使用糖蛋白的疫苗接种方法诱导免疫反应并保护猪抵抗伪狂犬病病毒(ADV)进行了比较评估。比较了不同的接种途径(皮内接种(i.d.)与肌肉接种(i.m.))、接种部位(颈部与背部)以及每个部位的接种点数(2个与6个)。在免疫期间,将攻毒后的体重(BW)变化和病毒排泄情况与病毒中和滴度、血清中抗原特异性IgG和IgA反应以及外周血中病毒特异性淋巴细胞增殖反应进行了比较。根据体重变化,六点皮内注射比两点皮内注射获得了更好的保护效果。背部六点皮内接种与颈部肌肉接种的结果相似,但在减少病毒排泄方面似乎较差。关于免疫学参数,血清中病毒特异性IgA反应对保护的指示作用最佳。可以得出结论,根据体重变化,背部六点皮内免疫和颈部肌肉免疫提供了最佳保护,并且六点皮内注射比两点皮内注射产生了更好的疫苗接种效果。