Commentary: measuring quality and impact of the World Wide Web.
作者信息
Wyatt J C
机构信息
ICRF Centre for Statistics in Medicine, Institute for Health Sciences, Oxford.
出版信息
BMJ. 1997 Jun 28;314(7098):1879-81. doi: 10.1136/bmj.314.7098.1879.
Abstract
摘要
相似文献
1
Commentary: measuring quality and impact of the World Wide Web.评论：衡量万维网的质量和影响
BMJ. 1997 Jun 28;314(7098):1879-81. doi: 10.1136/bmj.314.7098.1879.
2
Quality of medical information on the Internet.互联网上医学信息的质量。
JAMA. 1997 Aug 27;278(8):632; author reply 632-3. doi: 10.1001/jama.1997.03550080042025.
3
Quality of medical information on the Internet.互联网上医学信息的质量。
JAMA. 1997 Aug 27;278(8):632; author reply 632-3. doi: 10.1001/jama.278.8.632b.
4
Introduction to evaluation of interactive health communication applications. Science Panel on Interactive Communication and Health.交互式健康传播应用评估介绍。交互式传播与健康科学小组。
Am J Prev Med. 1999 Jan;16(1):10-5. doi: 10.1016/s0749-3797(98)00107-x.
5
Welcome to the body-wide web.欢迎来到遍布全身的网络。
Nat Biotechnol. 2006 Mar;24(3):282-3. doi: 10.1038/nbt0306-282.
6
Ensuring Secure and Safe Infusion Delivery in a Connected World.在互联世界中确保安全可靠的输液给药。
Biomed Instrum Technol. 2017 Sep 2;51(s6):38-41. doi: 10.2345/0899-8205-51.s6.38.
7
Internet health ratings systems: knowledge vs Babel.互联网健康评级系统：知识与混乱。
JAMA. 1998 Aug 26;280(8):698-9.
8
Internet health ratings systems: knowledge vs Babel.互联网健康评级系统：知识与混乱状态
JAMA. 1998 Aug 26;280(8):698; author reply 699.
9
Internet health ratings systems: knowledge vs Babel.互联网健康评级系统：知识与混乱。
JAMA. 1998 Aug 26;280(8):698; author reply 699.
10
Internet health ratings systems: knowledge vs Babel.互联网健康评级系统：知识与混乱。
JAMA. 1998 Aug 26;280(8):697-8; author reply 699. doi: 10.1001/jama.280.8.697.
引用本文的文献
1
Internet as a Source of Public Health Information on Acupuncture for Pain Relief: Credibility Assessment and Readability Analysis.互联网作为公众获取针灸缓解疼痛相关健康信息的来源：可信度评估与可读性分析。
Med Acupunct. 2024 Dec 17;36(6):350-358. doi: 10.1089/acu.2023.0136. eCollection 2024 Dec.
2
Quality and readability of English-language Internet information for vestibular disorders.关于前庭障碍的英文互联网信息的质量和可读性。
J Vestib Res. 2020;30(2):63-72. doi: 10.3233/VES-200698.
3
Quality of information available over internet on laparoscopic cholecystectomy.互联网上关于腹腔镜胆囊切除术的可用信息质量。
J Minim Access Surg. 2016 Oct-Dec;12(4):321-4. doi: 10.4103/0972-9941.186691.
4
Evaluation of Quality and Readability of Health Information Websites Identified through India's Major Search Engines.对通过印度主要搜索引擎识别出的健康信息网站的质量和可读性评估。
Adv Prev Med. 2016;2016:4815285. doi: 10.1155/2016/4815285. Epub 2016 Mar 28.
5
Internet information on birth options after caesarean compared to the RCOG patient information leaflet; a web survey.与英国皇家妇产科医师学院患者信息手册相比，关于剖宫产术后分娩方式的网络信息：一项网络调查
BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2014 Oct 11;14:361. doi: 10.1186/1471-2393-14-361.
6
Online resources for new mothers: opportunities and challenges for perinatal health professionals.新手妈妈的在线资源：围产期健康专业人员面临的机遇与挑战
J Perinat Educ. 2012 Spring;21(2):99-111. doi: 10.1891/1058-1243.21.2.99.
7
Evaluation of dengue-related health information on the internet.互联网上登革热相关健康信息的评估。
Perspect Health Inf Manag. 2012;9(Summer):1c. Epub 2012 Apr 1.
8
Treatments for neurodevelopmental disorders: evidence, advocacy, and the Internet.神经发育障碍的治疗方法：证据、倡导和互联网。
J Autism Dev Disord. 2013 Jan;43(1):122-33. doi: 10.1007/s10803-012-1551-7.
9
Surfing the internet for health information: an italian survey on use and population choices.上网查询健康信息：意大利使用情况和人群选择的调查。
BMC Med Inform Decis Mak. 2011 Apr 7;11:21. doi: 10.1186/1472-6947-11-21.
10
AskHERMES: An online question answering system for complex clinical questions.AskHERMES：一个用于复杂临床问题的在线问答系统。
J Biomed Inform. 2011 Apr;44(2):277-88. doi: 10.1016/j.jbi.2011.01.004. Epub 2011 Jan 21.
Zotero 插件