Desmurget M, Rossetti Y, Jordan M, Meckler C, Prablanc C
Vision et motricite, INSERM Unité 94, Bron, France.
Exp Brain Res. 1997 Jun;115(1):180-6. doi: 10.1007/pl00005680.
It is now well established that the accuracy of pointing movements to visual targets is worse in the full open loop condition (FOL; the hand is never visible) than in the static closed loop condition (SCL; the hand is only visible in static position prior to movement onset). In order to account for this result, it is generally admitted that viewing the hand in static position (SCL) improves the movement planning process by allowing a better encoding of the initial state of the motor apparatus. Interestingly, this wide-spread interpretation has recently been challenged by several studies suggesting that the effect of viewing the upper limb at rest might be explained in terms of the simultaneous vision of the hand and target. This result is supported by recent studies showing that goal-directed movements involve different types of planning (egocentric versus allocentric) depending on whether the hand and target are seen simultaneously or not before movement onset. The main aim of the present study was to test whether or not the accuracy improvement observed when the hand is visible before movement onset is related, at least partially, to a better encoding of the initial state of the upper limb. To address this question, we studied experimental conditions in which subjects were instructed to point with their right index finger toward their unseen left index finger. In that situation (proprioceptive pointing), the hand and target are never visible simultaneously and an improvement of movement accuracy in SCL, with respect to FOL, may only be explained by a better encoding of the initial state of the moving limb when vision is present. The results of this experiment showed that both the systematic and the variable errors were significantly lower in the SCL than in the FOL condition. This suggests: (1) that the effect of viewing the static hand prior to motion does not only depend on the simultaneous vision of the goal and the effector during movement planning; (2) that knowledge of the initial upper limb configuration or position is necessary to accurately plan goal-directed movements; (3) that static proprioceptive receptors are partially ineffective in providing an accurate estimate of the limb posture, and/or hand location relative to the body; and (4) that static visual information significantly improves the representation provided by the static proprioceptive channel.
现在已经充分证实,在完全开环条件(FOL;手始终不可见)下指向视觉目标的动作准确性比在静态闭环条件(SCL;手仅在动作开始前的静态位置可见)下要差。为了解释这一结果,人们普遍认为,在静态位置观察手(SCL)通过允许更好地编码运动装置的初始状态来改善运动规划过程。有趣的是,这种广泛传播的解释最近受到了几项研究的挑战,这些研究表明,静止时观察上肢的效果可能可以用手和目标的同时视觉来解释。这一结果得到了最近研究的支持,这些研究表明,目标导向的动作根据动作开始前手和目标是否同时可见而涉及不同类型的规划(以自我为中心与以他物为中心)。本研究的主要目的是测试动作开始前手可见时观察到的准确性提高是否至少部分与上肢初始状态的更好编码有关。为了解决这个问题,我们研究了实验条件,即指示受试者用右手食指指向他们看不见的左手食指。在那种情况下(本体感觉指向),手和目标从未同时可见,并且相对于FOL,SCL中运动准确性的提高只能通过视觉存在时对运动肢体初始状态的更好编码来解释。该实验结果表明,SCL中的系统误差和可变误差均显著低于FOL条件。这表明:(1)运动前观察静态手的效果不仅取决于运动规划过程中目标和效应器的同时视觉;(2)准确规划目标导向的动作需要了解上肢的初始配置或位置;(3)静态本体感受器在提供肢体姿势和/或手相对于身体位置的准确估计方面部分无效;(4)静态视觉信息显著改善了静态本体感觉通道提供的表征。