• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

The readability levels of cancer-prevention materials targeting African Americans.

作者信息

Guidry J J, Fagan P

机构信息

Department of Health and Kinesiology, Texas A&M University, College Station 77843, USA.

出版信息

J Cancer Educ. 1997 Summer;12(2):108-13. doi: 10.1080/08858199709528464.

DOI:10.1080/08858199709528464
PMID:9229274
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Several studies have examined the readability levels of cancer-prevention materials, but the readability levels of materials targeting African Americans have not been documented. The Cancer Prevention Materials and African-Americans project, funded in 1994 by the Texas Cancer Council, was developed to assess the readability levels and cultural sensitivity of cancer-prevention materials targeting African Americans.

METHODS

This study assessed the readability of 100 cancer-prevention materials using McLaughlin's SMOG grading. Illustrations and point sizes were also examined by research staff members.

RESULTS

Seventy-two percent of the material contained illustrations and 88% were printed using a 12-point font. An overall mean SMOG grade of 9.32 was found, which suggests that ninth graders can read and comprehend the text.

CONCLUSIONS

Although this grade level is lower than those indicated by previous studies, many of the printed materials may not be appropriate for African Americans at high risk for cancer: those with low incomes and little education. Health professionals should focus on decreasing the reading levels of print materials, pretesting audiences to determine their actual reading levels, and examining other factors that influence readability and comprehension.

摘要

相似文献

1
The readability levels of cancer-prevention materials targeting African Americans.
J Cancer Educ. 1997 Summer;12(2):108-13. doi: 10.1080/08858199709528464.
2
Cultural sensitivity and readability of breast and prostate printed cancer education materials targeting African Americans.针对非裔美国人的乳腺癌和前列腺癌印刷版癌症教育材料的文化敏感性和可读性。
J Natl Med Assoc. 1998 Mar;90(3):165-9.
3
Assessing cultural sensitivity in printed cancer materials.评估印刷版癌症资料中的文化敏感性。
Cancer Pract. 1999 Nov-Dec;7(6):291-6. doi: 10.1046/j.1523-5394.1999.76005.x.
4
Literacy, readability and cultural barriers: critical factors to consider when educating older African Americans about anticoagulation therapy.读写能力、可读性和文化障碍:在对老年非裔美国人进行抗凝治疗教育时需考虑的关键因素。
J Clin Nurs. 2003 Mar;12(2):275-82. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2702.2003.00711.x.
5
Assessment of selected patient educational materials of various chain pharmacies.对各连锁药店选定的患者教育资料的评估。
J Health Commun. 2004 Mar-Apr;9(2):91-3. doi: 10.1080/10810730490425213.
6
Prostate Cancer Information Available in Health-Care Provider Offices: An Analysis of Content, Readability, and Cultural Sensitivity.医疗服务机构办公室提供的前列腺癌信息:内容、可读性及文化敏感性分析
Am J Mens Health. 2018 Jul;12(4):1160-1167. doi: 10.1177/1557988318768599. Epub 2018 Apr 12.
7
Readability of Patient Education Materials in Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation (PM&R): A Comparative Cross-Sectional Study.物理医学与康复(PM&R)患者教育材料的可读性:一项比较性横断面研究。
PM R. 2020 Apr;12(4):368-373. doi: 10.1002/pmrj.12230. Epub 2019 Sep 18.
8
An analysis of printed breast cancer information for African American women.对非裔美国女性乳腺癌印刷信息的分析。
J Cancer Educ. 2000 Spring;15(1):23-7. doi: 10.1080/08858190009528648.
9
Printed health information materials: evaluation of readability and suitability.印刷版健康信息材料:可读性与适用性评估
J Community Health Nurs. 2008 Apr-Jun;25(2):73-90. doi: 10.1080/07370010802017083.
10
What's in Between the Lines: Assessing the Readability, Understandability, and Actionability in Breast Cancer Survivorship Print Materials.字里行间的信息:评估乳腺癌生存者印刷材料的可阅读性、可理解性和可操作性。
J Cancer Educ. 2022 Oct;37(5):1532-1539. doi: 10.1007/s13187-021-02003-4. Epub 2021 Apr 6.

引用本文的文献

1
The "long tail" and public health: new thinking for addressing health disparities.“长尾”与公共卫生:解决健康差距的新思路。
Am J Public Health. 2014 Dec;104(12):2271-8. doi: 10.2105/AJPH.2014.302039. Epub 2014 Oct 16.
2
Availability and readability of emergency preparedness materials for deaf and hard-of-hearing and older adult populations: issues and assessments.聋人和听障人士以及老年人群体的应急准备材料的可用性和可读性:问题和评估。
PLoS One. 2013;8(2):e55614. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0055614. Epub 2013 Feb 25.
3
Promoting health literacy.
提升健康素养。
J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2005 Mar-Apr;12(2):152-63. doi: 10.1197/jamia.M1687. Epub 2004 Nov 23.
4
Online health information and low-literacy African Americans.在线健康信息与低文化水平的非裔美国人。
J Med Internet Res. 2004 Sep 3;6(3):e26. doi: 10.2196/jmir.6.3.e26.
5
Cultural sensitivity and readability of breast and prostate printed cancer education materials targeting African Americans.针对非裔美国人的乳腺癌和前列腺癌印刷版癌症教育材料的文化敏感性和可读性。
J Natl Med Assoc. 1998 Mar;90(3):165-9.