Vives Corrons J L, Jou J M, Aymerich M, Rozman M, Villamor N, Aguilar i Bascompte J L, Marín J L, Lloret M, Besson I
Servei d'Hematologia Biològica, Laboratori Central d'Hematología de l'Hospital Clínic i Provincial, Facultat de Medicina, Universitat de Barcelona.
Sangre (Barc). 1997 Feb;42(1):31-7.
To assess the reliability of the differential leucocyte count (DLC) and the left shift flagging (LSF) system provided by the Coulter MAXM (MAXM) haematology analyzer.
380 blood specimens (drawn with tri-K EDTA as anticoagulant) were studied.
By using the reference method (NCCLS H20-A), 50 out of the 380 blood specimens presented abnormal DLC (bands > 6%). Of from these, in 39 (80%) the MAXM displayed LSF of "bands 1 or 2". In 118 left shift flagged specimens (MAXM) with normal manual DLC, 87 (74%) had the "bands 1" alarm and 31 (26%) the "bands 2" alarm. Accordingly if the LSF "bands 1" is overlooked, the percentage of FP decreases from 36% to 10% but the percentage of false negatives (FN) increases from 22% to 58%. In order to improve the appreciation of LSF by decreasing the need of manual revisions, the visual examination of the leucocyte distribution scattergram (LDS), also provided by the MAXM, was conveniently evaluated. This study was performed on 190 blood specimens from which the MAXM displayed a normal DLC in 122 (64%), the LSF of "bands" in 44 (23%) and the LSF of "bands 2" in 24 (12.6%). Of from the 122 specimens with normal DLC, four were FN, of from the 44 specimens with "bands 1" LSF, 37 were FP and of from the 24 specimens with "bands 2" LSF, 16 were FP. The visual appreciation of the LDS showed in the majority of samples with "bands 1" and "bands 2" a definitely different shape consisting in a sharper image up to the top of the picture when compared to samples with normal DLC (without flags). According to this criteria, all the 122 specimens with normal DLC displayed a normal LDS and all the 24 specimens with "bands 2" flag displayed abnormal LDS. Of from the 44 specimens with "bands 1" flag, 26 (59%) showed an abnormal LDS and 18 (41%) a normal LDS. It is noteworthy that of from the 26 specimens with abnormal LDS only 7 were true positive (TP), whereas the 18 specimens with normal LDS all showed a normal DLC according to the reference method. These data allow us to conclude that manual revision was required in 26 out of 68 specimens with "bands 1" and abnormal LDS (13% of the total) and in all the 24 specimens with "bands 2" flag. Therefore by using the information provided by the LDS the need of manual revision decreases to 73% of the total sample with LSF.
Our results give further support to the idea that th VCS method used by the Coulter MAXM provides a high quality DLC with specific left shift detection.
评估库尔特MAXM血液分析仪提供的白细胞分类计数(DLC)和核左移标记(LSF)系统的可靠性。
研究了380份血液标本(用三联K乙二胺四乙酸作为抗凝剂采集)。
采用参考方法(NCCLS H20-A),380份血液标本中有50份呈现异常DLC(杆状核细胞>6%)。其中,39份(80%)MAXM显示“杆状核细胞1或2”的LSF。在118份手动DLC正常但被MAXM标记为核左移的标本中,87份(74%)有“杆状核细胞1”警报,31份(26%)有“杆状核细胞2”警报。因此,如果忽略LSF“杆状核细胞1”,假阳性(FP)百分比从36%降至10%,但假阴性(FN)百分比从22%增至58%。为了通过减少手动复查的需求来提高对LSF的识别,对MAXM提供的白细胞分布散点图(LDS)的视觉检查进行了便利评估。该研究对190份血液标本进行,其中MAXM显示正常DLC的有122份(64%),“杆状核细胞”的LSF有44份(23%),“杆状核细胞2”的LSF有24份(12.6%)。在122份DLC正常的标本中,4份为FN;在44份有“杆状核细胞1”LSF的标本中,37份为FP;在24份有“杆状核细胞2”LSF的标本中,16份为FP。对LDS的视觉评估显示,在大多数有"杆状核细胞1"和"杆状核细胞2"的样本中,与DLC正常(无标记)的样本相比,其形状明显不同,在图像顶部呈现更清晰的图像。根据该标准,所有122份DLC正常的标本均显示LDS正常,所有24份有"杆状核细胞2"标记的标本均显示LDS异常。在44份有"杆状核细胞1"标记的标本中,26份(59%)显示LDS异常,18份(41%)显示LDS正常。值得注意的是,在26份LDS异常的标本中,只有7份为真阳性(TP),而18份LDS正常的标本根据参考方法均显示DLC正常。这些数据使我们得出结论,在68份有"杆状核细胞1"且LDS异常的标本中,有26份(占总数的13%)需要手动复查,所有24份有"杆状核细胞2"标记的标本也需要手动复查。因此,通过使用LDS提供的信息,需要手动复查的样本减少到有LSF的总样本的73%。
我们的结果进一步支持了这样一种观点,即库尔特MAXM使用的VCS方法可提供高质量的DLC并能进行特定的核左移检测。