Suppr超能文献

[瑞芬太尼与丙泊酚或异氟烷。关节镜手术后恢复时间的比较]

[Remifentanil with propofol or isoflurane. A comparison of the recovery times after arthroscopic surgery].

作者信息

Wilhelm W, Huppert A, Brün K, Grüness V, Larsen R

机构信息

Klinik für Anaesthesiologie und Intensivmedizin, Universitätskliniken des Saarlandes.

出版信息

Anaesthesist. 1997 Apr;46(4):335-8. doi: 10.1007/s001010050408.

Abstract

OBJECTIVES

Due to its unique pharmacokinetics, the new esterase-metabolised opioid remifentanil results in rapid post-anesthesia recovery. The aim of this clinical investigation was to compare recovery times after remifentanil anaesthesia in combination with hypnotic concentrations of either propofol or isoflurane. Dosages used in the study protocol were based on recommendations by the pharmaceutical manufacturer.

METHODS

Patients (ASA status I-II) scheduled for elective arthroscopy were included in this trial. Without premedication in the morning, anaesthesia was induced identically in both groups: remifentanil bolus (1 microgram/kg), start of remifentanil-infusion (0.5 micrograms/kg/min), followed immediately by propofol (ca. 2 mg/kg). For maintenance of anaesthesia remifentanil (0.25 micrograms/kg/min) was combined with either a propofol infusion of 0.1 mg/kg/min or 0.5 MAC isoflurane (= 0.6 vol. %) in O2/air. Anaesthetic delivery was discontinued simultaneously with termination of surgery and recovery times were recorded.

RESULTS

A total of 40 patients were studied at random in two groups of 20 each with comparable demographic data and anaesthetic technique (Tables 1 and 2). In both groups emergence was very rapid. Recovery times were significantly shorter for remifentanil-isoflurane than for remifentanil-propofol (Table 3): spontaneous ventilation 5.1 vs 8.1 min (P < 0.05), extubation 5.5 vs 8.6 min (P < 0.02), post-anaesthesia recovery score > or = 9 of 10 points 6.2 vs 11.3 min (P < 0.01), and arrival at PACU 16.2 vs 19.2 min (P < 0.01). Mild to moderate shivering was noted in 40% of all patients (9 cases following isoflurane, 7 following propofol).

CONCLUSIONS

Using the manufacturer's recommended dosages, emergence after remifentanil anaesthesia is more rapid with 0.5 MAC isoflurane than with 0.1 mg/kg/min propofol. These results are most probably due to the different pharmacological properties of both co-anaesthetics, especially the applied dosages, and to different interactions with remifentanil. Present clinical experience suggests that a further dose reduction, especially for propofol, is possible. For both remifentanil groups emergence was remarkably rapid between return of consciousness and the awake state (on-off phenomenon), which might contribute to post-anaesthesia safety.

摘要

目的

新型酯酶代谢型阿片类药物瑞芬太尼具有独特的药代动力学特性,可使患者在麻醉后迅速恢复。本临床研究旨在比较瑞芬太尼与催眠浓度的丙泊酚或异氟烷联合麻醉后的恢复时间。研究方案中使用的剂量基于药品制造商的建议。

方法

本试验纳入计划接受择期关节镜检查的患者(ASA分级I-II级)。两组患者均于上午未使用术前用药,麻醉诱导方式相同:静脉注射瑞芬太尼(1微克/千克),开始输注瑞芬太尼(0.5微克/千克/分钟),随后立即静脉注射丙泊酚(约2毫克/千克)。维持麻醉时,瑞芬太尼(0.25微克/千克/分钟)与0.1毫克/千克/分钟的丙泊酚输注液或氧气/空气混合的0.5 MAC异氟烷(=0.6体积%)联合使用。手术结束时同时停止麻醉给药,并记录恢复时间。

结果

40例患者被随机分为两组,每组20例,两组患者的人口统计学数据和麻醉技术具有可比性(表1和表2)。两组患者苏醒均非常迅速。瑞芬太尼-异氟烷组的恢复时间显著短于瑞芬太尼-丙泊酚组(表3):自主呼吸恢复时间分别为5.1分钟和8.1分钟(P<0.05),拔管时间分别为5.5分钟和8.6分钟(P<0.02),麻醉后恢复评分≥9分(满分10分)的时间分别为6.2分钟和11.3分钟(P<0.01),到达麻醉后恢复室的时间分别为16.2分钟和19.2分钟(P<0.01)。40%的患者出现轻度至中度寒战(异氟烷组9例,丙泊酚组7例)。

结论

使用制造商推荐的剂量时,瑞芬太尼麻醉后,0.5 MAC异氟烷组的苏醒比0.1毫克/千克/分钟丙泊酚组更快。这些结果很可能归因于两种辅助麻醉剂不同的药理学特性,尤其是所使用的剂量,以及与瑞芬太尼的不同相互作用。目前的临床经验表明,尤其是丙泊酚,可能进一步降低剂量。对于两个瑞芬太尼组,从意识恢复到清醒状态的苏醒过程都非常迅速(开-关现象),这可能有助于提高麻醉后安全性。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验