[Remifentanil in gynecologic laparoscopy. A comparison of consciousness and circulatory effects of a combination with desflurane and propofol].

OBJECTIVES

Rapid post-anaesthetic awakening and low hypnotic potency are two characteristic properties of the new opioid remifentanil. For clinical use remifentanil must be combined with another anaesthetic agent. Propofol is well-established for ambulatory anaesthesia, however, the properties of desflurane (low blood-gas solubility, rapid elimination) suggest this volatile anaesthetic to be a comparable alternative, particularly if rapid awakening is desired. The present study was designed to compare emergence times and haemodynamics for a combination of remifentanil wich hypnotic concentrations of either propofol or desflurane.

METHODS

Gynaecological patients, scheduled for elective laparoscopy, were studied at random. After oral premedication with diazepam 0.08-0.12 mg/kg, anaesthesia was induced identically in both groups: remifentanil bolus (1 microgram/kg), start of remifentanil infusion (0.5 microgram/kg/min), followed by propofol (approx. 2 mg/kg) and cisatracurium (0.1 mg/kg). For maintenance of anaesthesia remifentanil (0.25 microgram/kg/min) was combined with either desflurane (0.5 MAC = 3.0 vol%) or propofol (6 mg/kg/h). With termination of surgery anaesthetic delivery was discontinued simultaneously and recovery times were recorded. Heart rate and non-invasive blood pressure were recorded at defined points of interest.

RESULTS

In total, 40 patients (desflurane n = 20, propofol n = 20) were studied in comparable groups. For both regimens, emergence after remifentanil-based anaesthesia was remarkably rapid between unconsciousness and complete recovery: In mean only 60 s elapsed from the onset of spontaneous breathing to the moment when patients could clearly state their name. In comparison, recovery times were significantly shorter after remifentanil-desflurane than after remifentanil-propofol: time to spontaneous ventilation 6.4 +/- 2.8 vs. 9.6 +/- 3.9 min (mean +/- SD, p = 0.01); extubation 6.7 +/- 2.8 vs. 9.8 +/- 4.0 min (p = 0.02) and arrival at PACU 11.1 +/- 3.4 vs. 14.7 +/- 4.2 min (p = 0.005). The courses of heart rate (HR) and mean arterial pressure (MAP) were mostly similar in both groups with only minimal or moderate cardiocirculatory reactions during intubation or start of surgery.

CONCLUSIONS

Remifentanil in combination with either desflurane or propofol, used for general anaesthesia during gynaecological laparoscopy, will facilitate a smooth haemodynamic course as well as a rapid emergence thereafter. Recovery times after remifentanil-based anaesthesia are significantly shorter with 3.0 vol% of desflurane than with 6 mg/kg/h propofol. Thus, desflurane appears to be a well-suited adjunct to remifentanil and an ideal alternative to propofol, if rapid recovery is required. Differences are best explained by the pharmacological properties of both coanaesthetics and their applied dosages.