Mangelsdorff A D, Rogers J R, Zucker K W, Thieschafer C L, Hagen J P, Finstuen K
U.S. Army-Baylor University Graduate Program in Health Care Administration, U.S. Army Medical Department Center and School, Fort Sam Houston, TX 78234-6135, USA.
Mil Med. 1997 Jul;162(7):450-2.
A Delphi study was conducted of Army senior Medical Service Corps leaders (O6s) to identify the expected behaviors and competencies needed to ensure that junior officers will achieve successful careers as Medical Service Corps officers in the 21st century. A Delphi mailing was conducted in two phases. In the first iteration, 41 behaviors were identified to be of importance. In the second mailing, the 41 behaviors were rated for relative importance on a 7-point bipolar rating scale (1 = unimportant, 7 = most important). Comparisons were made between the ratings of administrative and biomedical scientific/technical (BS/T) series. Discriminant models developed to compare demographics between administrative and BS/T officers indicated that administrative officers had more time in grade, years of service, and professional military education, whereas BS/T officers reported significantly more civilian education. Minor differences among the two groups emerged for behavior ratings; however, the final priority order of behaviors reflected a high degree of consensus from both groups.
针对陆军医疗勤务部队高级军官（O6级）开展了一项德尔菲研究，以确定确保初级军官在21世纪成为成功的医疗勤务部队军官所需的预期行为和能力。德尔菲问卷调查分两个阶段进行。在第一轮调查中，确定了41种重要行为。在第二轮调查中，对这41种行为在7点双极评分量表上的相对重要性进行评分（1=不重要，7=最重要）。对行政系列和生物医学科学/技术（BS/T）系列的评分进行了比较。为比较行政军官和BS/T军官的人口统计学特征而开发的判别模型表明，行政军官在军阶、服役年限和专业军事教育方面的时间更长，而BS/T军官报告的 civilian education（此处原文有误，推测可能是“文职教育”civilian education）显著更多。两组在行为评分上出现了细微差异；然而，行为的最终优先顺序反映了两组的高度共识。
