van der Heijden G J, van der Windt D A, de Winter A F
Institute for Rehabilitation Research, Hoensbroek, Netherlands.
BMJ. 1997 Jul 5;315(7099):25-30. doi: 10.1136/bmj.315.7099.25.
To assess the effectiveness of physiotherapy for patients with soft tissue shoulder disorders.
A systematic computerised literature search of Medline and Embase, supplemented with citation tracking, for relevant trials with random allocation published before 1996.
Patients treated with physiotherapy for disorders of soft tissue of the shoulder.
Success rates, mobility, pain, functional status.
Six of the 20 assessed trials satisfied at least five of eight validity criteria. Assessment of methods was often hampered by insufficient information on various validity criteria, and trials were often flawed by lack of blinding, high proportions of withdrawals from treatment, and high proportions of missing values. Trial sizes were small: only six trials included intervention groups of more than 25 patients. Ultrasound therapy, evaluated in six trials, was not shown to be effective. Four other trials favoured physiotherapy (laser therapy or manipulation), but the validity of their methods was unsatisfactory.
There is evidence that ultrasound therapy is ineffective in the treatment of soft tissue shoulder disorders. Due to small trial sizes and unsatisfactory methods, evidence for the effectiveness of other methods of physiotherapy is inconclusive. For all methods of treatment, trials were too heterogeneous with respect to included patients, index and reference treatments, and follow up to merit valid statistical pooling. Future studies should show whether physiotherapy is superior to treatment with drugs, steroid injections, or a wait and see policy.
评估物理治疗对肩部软组织疾病患者的疗效。
对Medline和Embase进行系统的计算机文献检索,并辅以引文追踪,以查找1996年前发表的随机分配的相关试验。
接受物理治疗的肩部软组织疾病患者。
成功率、活动度、疼痛、功能状态。
20项评估试验中有6项至少满足8项有效性标准中的5项。对方法的评估常常因各种有效性标准的信息不足而受阻,试验常常存在缺乏盲法、治疗退出比例高和缺失值比例高的缺陷。试验规模较小:只有6项试验的干预组患者超过25人。在6项试验中评估的超声治疗未显示有效。其他4项试验支持物理治疗(激光治疗或手法治疗),但其方法的有效性不令人满意。
有证据表明超声治疗对肩部软组织疾病无效。由于试验规模小且方法不令人满意,其他物理治疗方法有效性的证据尚无定论。对于所有治疗方法,纳入的患者、指标和对照治疗以及随访方面的试验差异太大,无法进行有效的统计汇总。未来的研究应表明物理治疗是否优于药物治疗、类固醇注射或观察等待策略。