Suppr超能文献

基层医疗中肩部疾病诊断的测试者间可靠性

Intertester reliability of shoulder complaints diagnoses in primary health care.

作者信息

Storheil Benny, Klouman Elise, Holmvik Stian, Emaus Nina, Fleten Nils

机构信息

a Department of Health and Care Sciences , UiT the Arctic University of Norway , Tromsø , Norway ;

b Department of Community Medicine , UiT the Arctic University of Norway , Tromsø , Norway.

出版信息

Scand J Prim Health Care. 2016 Sep;34(3):224-31. doi: 10.1080/02813432.2016.1207139. Epub 2016 Jul 12.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

Shoulder complaints are frequently encountered in general practice, but precise diagnosing is challenging. This study investigated agreement of shoulder complaints diagnoses between clinicians in a primary health care setting.

DESIGN

Cross-sectional study.

SETTING

Four primary health care clinicians used patients' history and functional examination of the shoulder by selective tissue tension techniques (STTs), to diagnose shoulder complaints.

SUBJECTS

62 patients, aged 18-75 years.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE

Reliability of diagnoses was assessed by observed intertester agreement and Cohen's kappa. A total of 372 diagnostic pairs were available for intertester comparisons.

RESULTS

Six diagnoses were assigned by all clinicians; supraspinatus-, infraspinatus-, subscapularis-tendinopathies; chronic subacromial bursitis; glenohumeral capsulitis, and acromioclavicular joint lesion. The observed agreement on these diagnoses ranged from 0.84 for glenohumeral capsulitis to 0.97 for acromioclavicular joint lesion. Kappa scores were 0.46 (95% CI 0.33, 0.58) for chronic subacromial bursitis; 0.53 (95% CI 0.34, 0.68), 0.59 (95% CI 0.47, 0.70), and 0.68 (95% CI 0.53, 0.82) for infraspinatus -, supraspinatus -, and subscapularis-tendinopathy, respectively. For glenohumeral capsulitis and acromioclavicular lesion kappa scores were 0.66 (95% CI 0.57, 0.73) and 0.78 (95% CI 0.61, 0.90). Kappa scores were higher for individual diagnoses than for individual tests, except for limitation in passive abduction (0.70, 95% CI 0.62, 0.78) and passive lateral rotation (0.66, 95% CI 0.57, 0.73).

CONCLUSIONS

Although experienced clinicians showed substantial intertester agreement, precise diagnoses of shoulder complaints in primary health care remain a challenge. The present results call for further research on refined diagnoses of shoulder complaints. Key points   Based on medical history and a systematic functional examination by selective tissue tension techniques (STTs), we investigated the agreement of shoulder complaints diagnoses across four primary health care clinicians and 62 patients. • Agreements on diagnoses were generally better than the agreement on individual tests. • Good kappa scores were obtained for the diagnoses glenohumeral capsulitis, rotator cuff tendinopathy, and acromioclavicular lesion. • Further research is necessary to investigate the diagnostic validity of functional shoulder examination by the STTs method.

摘要

目的

肩部疾病在全科医疗中经常遇到,但准确诊断具有挑战性。本研究调查了基层医疗环境中临床医生对肩部疾病诊断的一致性。

设计

横断面研究。

背景

四名基层医疗临床医生通过选择性组织张力技术(STT)利用患者病史和肩部功能检查来诊断肩部疾病。

研究对象

62名年龄在18 - 75岁的患者。

主要观察指标

通过观察测试者间的一致性和科恩kappa系数评估诊断的可靠性。共有372对诊断可供测试者间比较。

结果

所有临床医生都做出了六种诊断;分别是冈上肌、冈下肌、肩胛下肌腱病;慢性肩峰下滑囊炎;盂肱关节囊炎和肩锁关节病变。这些诊断的观察一致性范围从盂肱关节囊炎的0.84到肩锁关节病变的0.97。慢性肩峰下滑囊炎的kappa系数为0.46(95%可信区间0.33,0.58);冈下肌、冈上肌和肩胛下肌腱病的kappa系数分别为0.53(95%可信区间0.34,0.68)、0.59(95%可信区间0.47,0.70)和0.68(95%可信区间0.53,0.82)。盂肱关节囊炎和肩锁关节病变的kappa系数分别为0.66(95%可信区间0.57,0.73)和0.78(95%可信区间0.61,0.90)。除了被动外展受限(0.70,95%可信区间0.62,0.78)和被动外旋(0.66,95%可信区间0.57,0.73)外,个体诊断的kappa系数高于个体测试。

结论

尽管经验丰富的临床医生表现出了较高的测试者间一致性,但基层医疗中肩部疾病的准确诊断仍然是一项挑战。目前的结果呼吁对肩部疾病的精确诊断进行进一步研究。要点 基于病史和通过选择性组织张力技术(STT)进行的系统功能检查,我们调查了四名基层医疗临床医生和62名患者对肩部疾病诊断的一致性。• 诊断的一致性总体上优于个体测试的一致性。• 盂肱关节囊炎、肩袖肌腱病和肩锁关节病变的诊断获得了良好的kappa系数。• 有必要进一步研究STT方法对肩部功能检查的诊断有效性。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验