Storheil Benny, Klouman Elise, Holmvik Stian, Emaus Nina, Fleten Nils
a Department of Health and Care Sciences , UiT the Arctic University of Norway , Tromsø , Norway ;
b Department of Community Medicine , UiT the Arctic University of Norway , Tromsø , Norway.
Scand J Prim Health Care. 2016 Sep;34(3):224-31. doi: 10.1080/02813432.2016.1207139. Epub 2016 Jul 12.
Shoulder complaints are frequently encountered in general practice, but precise diagnosing is challenging. This study investigated agreement of shoulder complaints diagnoses between clinicians in a primary health care setting.
Cross-sectional study.
Four primary health care clinicians used patients' history and functional examination of the shoulder by selective tissue tension techniques (STTs), to diagnose shoulder complaints.
62 patients, aged 18-75 years.
Reliability of diagnoses was assessed by observed intertester agreement and Cohen's kappa. A total of 372 diagnostic pairs were available for intertester comparisons.
Six diagnoses were assigned by all clinicians; supraspinatus-, infraspinatus-, subscapularis-tendinopathies; chronic subacromial bursitis; glenohumeral capsulitis, and acromioclavicular joint lesion. The observed agreement on these diagnoses ranged from 0.84 for glenohumeral capsulitis to 0.97 for acromioclavicular joint lesion. Kappa scores were 0.46 (95% CI 0.33, 0.58) for chronic subacromial bursitis; 0.53 (95% CI 0.34, 0.68), 0.59 (95% CI 0.47, 0.70), and 0.68 (95% CI 0.53, 0.82) for infraspinatus -, supraspinatus -, and subscapularis-tendinopathy, respectively. For glenohumeral capsulitis and acromioclavicular lesion kappa scores were 0.66 (95% CI 0.57, 0.73) and 0.78 (95% CI 0.61, 0.90). Kappa scores were higher for individual diagnoses than for individual tests, except for limitation in passive abduction (0.70, 95% CI 0.62, 0.78) and passive lateral rotation (0.66, 95% CI 0.57, 0.73).
Although experienced clinicians showed substantial intertester agreement, precise diagnoses of shoulder complaints in primary health care remain a challenge. The present results call for further research on refined diagnoses of shoulder complaints. Key points Based on medical history and a systematic functional examination by selective tissue tension techniques (STTs), we investigated the agreement of shoulder complaints diagnoses across four primary health care clinicians and 62 patients. • Agreements on diagnoses were generally better than the agreement on individual tests. • Good kappa scores were obtained for the diagnoses glenohumeral capsulitis, rotator cuff tendinopathy, and acromioclavicular lesion. • Further research is necessary to investigate the diagnostic validity of functional shoulder examination by the STTs method.
肩部疾病在全科医疗中经常遇到,但准确诊断具有挑战性。本研究调查了基层医疗环境中临床医生对肩部疾病诊断的一致性。
横断面研究。
四名基层医疗临床医生通过选择性组织张力技术(STT)利用患者病史和肩部功能检查来诊断肩部疾病。
62名年龄在18 - 75岁的患者。
通过观察测试者间的一致性和科恩kappa系数评估诊断的可靠性。共有372对诊断可供测试者间比较。
所有临床医生都做出了六种诊断;分别是冈上肌、冈下肌、肩胛下肌腱病;慢性肩峰下滑囊炎;盂肱关节囊炎和肩锁关节病变。这些诊断的观察一致性范围从盂肱关节囊炎的0.84到肩锁关节病变的0.97。慢性肩峰下滑囊炎的kappa系数为0.46(95%可信区间0.33,0.58);冈下肌、冈上肌和肩胛下肌腱病的kappa系数分别为0.53(95%可信区间0.34,0.68)、0.59(95%可信区间0.47,0.70)和0.68(95%可信区间0.53,0.82)。盂肱关节囊炎和肩锁关节病变的kappa系数分别为0.66(95%可信区间0.57,0.73)和0.78(95%可信区间0.61,0.90)。除了被动外展受限(0.70,95%可信区间0.62,0.78)和被动外旋(0.66,95%可信区间0.57,0.73)外,个体诊断的kappa系数高于个体测试。
尽管经验丰富的临床医生表现出了较高的测试者间一致性,但基层医疗中肩部疾病的准确诊断仍然是一项挑战。目前的结果呼吁对肩部疾病的精确诊断进行进一步研究。要点 基于病史和通过选择性组织张力技术(STT)进行的系统功能检查,我们调查了四名基层医疗临床医生和62名患者对肩部疾病诊断的一致性。• 诊断的一致性总体上优于个体测试的一致性。• 盂肱关节囊炎、肩袖肌腱病和肩锁关节病变的诊断获得了良好的kappa系数。• 有必要进一步研究STT方法对肩部功能检查的诊断有效性。