Suppr超能文献

使用低能量电击进行心房颤动的经静脉心脏复律。

Transvenous cardioversion of atrial fibrillation using low-energy shocks.

作者信息

Socas A G, Ricard P, Taramasco V, Guenoun M, Lévy S

机构信息

University of Marseille, School of Medicine, Cardiology Division, France.

出版信息

J Interv Card Electrophysiol. 1997 Sep;1(2):125-9. doi: 10.1023/a:1009751031170.

Abstract

Recent reports have suggested that transvenous cardioversion of atrial fibrillation is feasible using low-energy shocks and a right atrium coronary sinus electrode configuration. We evaluated in a prospective study the efficacy and safety of low-energy internal cardioversion of atrial fibrillation in 104 consecutive patients. Sixty-two patients presented with chronic atrial fibrillation (group I), 16 had paroxysmal atrial fibrillation (group II), and 26 had an induced atrial fibrillation episode (group III). The mean duration of the presenting episode of atrial fibrillation was 9 +/- 19 months for group I, 4 +/- 2 days for group II, and 18 +/- 7 minutes for group III. Atrial defibrillation was performed using two intracardiac catheters: one was placed in the right atrium (cathode) and the other in the coronary sinus or in the left branch of the pulmonary artery (anode). The catheters were connected to a customized external defibrillator capable of delivering 3/3-ms biphasic waveform shocks with a voltage programmable between 10 and 400 volts. The shocks were synchronized to the R wave. Sinus rhythm was restored in 44 of the 62 patients in group I (70%), in 12 of the 16 patients in group II (75%), and in 20 of 26 patients in group III (77%). The mean voltage and energy required for cardioversion were respectively 300 +/- 68 V and 3.5 +/- 1.5 J, for group I, 245 +/- 72 V and 2.0 +/- 0.9 J for group II, and 270 +/- 67 V and 2.6 +/- 1.2 J for group III. The leading-edge voltage required for sinus rhythm restoration was significantly higher (p < 0.05) in the chronic atrial fibrillation group than in the paroxysmal or induced groups. No proarrhythmic effects occurred for the delivered 686 R-wave synchronized shocks. This study of a large group of patients confirms and extends the results of previous reports. Such findings may have clinical implications for elective cardioversion of atrial fibrillation and the development of an implantable atrial defibrillator.

摘要

最近的报告表明,使用低能量电击和右心房-冠状窦电极配置进行心房颤动的经静脉心脏复律是可行的。我们在一项前瞻性研究中评估了104例连续患者进行低能量心房颤动体内复律的有效性和安全性。62例患者为慢性心房颤动(I组),16例为阵发性心房颤动(II组),26例有诱发性心房颤动发作(III组)。I组心房颤动发作的平均持续时间为9±19个月,II组为4±2天,III组为18±7分钟。使用两根心内导管进行心房除颤:一根置于右心房(阴极),另一根置于冠状窦或肺动脉左分支(阳极)。导管连接到定制的体外除颤器,该除颤器能够输送3/3毫秒双相波形电击,电压可在10至400伏之间编程。电击与R波同步。I组62例患者中有44例(70%)恢复窦性心律,II组16例患者中有12例(75%),III组26例患者中有20例(77%)。I组复律所需的平均电压和能量分别为300±68V和3.5±1.5J,II组为245±72V和2.0±0.9J,III组为270±67V和2.6±1.2J。慢性心房颤动组恢复窦性心律所需的前沿电压显著高于阵发性或诱发性心房颤动组(p<0.05)。在686次输送的R波同步电击过程中未出现促心律失常作用。这项对一大组患者的研究证实并扩展了先前报告的结果。这些发现可能对心房颤动的择期复律和植入式心房除颤器的开发具有临床意义。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验