Teach S J, Yates E W, Feld L G
Department of Pediatrics, State University of New York at Buffalo, School of Medicine and Biomedical Sciences, USA.
Clin Pediatr (Phila). 1997 Jul;36(7):395-400. doi: 10.1177/000992289703600703.
To determine which laboratory studies are most predictive of the fluid deficit in acutely dehydrated children, we studied a convenience sample of 40 children requiring intravenous fluid resuscitation. Nine laboratory studies (serum BUN/cr, total serum CO2, serum uric acid, serum anion gap, urine anion gap, venous pH, venous base deficit, urine specific gravity, and fractional excretion of sodium) were individually assessed in simple linear regression models with fluid deficit as the dependent variable. Only the serum BUN/cr and serum uric acid were significantly associated with increasing fluid deficit (r = 0.52, P = 0.0005 and r = 0.35, P = 0.03, respectively). The sensitivities and specificities of these two laboratory studies for the detection of > 5% fluid deficit were poor. Conventional laboratory studies used to assess dehydration in children are poorly predictive of fluid deficits.
为了确定哪些实验室检查最能预测急性脱水儿童的液体缺失情况,我们对40名需要静脉液体复苏的儿童进行了一项便利抽样研究。在以液体缺失为因变量的简单线性回归模型中,分别评估了九项实验室检查(血清尿素氮/肌酐、血清总二氧化碳、血清尿酸、血清阴离子间隙、尿阴离子间隙、静脉血pH值、静脉血碱缺失、尿比重和钠排泄分数)。只有血清尿素氮/肌酐和血清尿酸与液体缺失增加显著相关(r分别为0.52,P = 0.0005和r = 0.35,P = 0.03)。这两项实验室检查检测液体缺失>5%的敏感性和特异性较差。用于评估儿童脱水情况的传统实验室检查对液体缺失的预测能力较差。