Suppr超能文献

比较脱水的临床和生化标志物与儿童临床脱水量表:病例对照试验。

Comparison of clinical and biochemical markers of dehydration with the clinical dehydration scale in children: a case comparison trial.

机构信息

Department of Pediatrics, Western University, 800 Commissioners Road East, London, ON N6A 5W9, Canada.

出版信息

BMC Pediatr. 2014 Jun 16;14:149. doi: 10.1186/1471-2431-14-149.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

The clinical dehydration scale (CDS) is a quick, easy-to-use tool with 4 clinical items and a score of 1-8 that serves to classify dehydration in children with gastroenteritis as no, some or moderate/severe dehydration. Studies validating the CDS (Friedman JN) with a comparison group remain elusive. We hypothesized that the CDS correlates with a wide spectrum of established markers of dehydration, making it an appropriate and easy-to-use clinical tool.

METHODS

This study was designed as a prospective double-cohort trial in a single tertiary care center. Children with diarrhea and vomiting, who clinically required intravenous fluids for rehydration, were compared with minor trauma patients who required intravenous needling for conscious sedation. We compared the CDS with clinical and urinary markers (urinary electrolytes, proteins, ratios and fractional excretions) for dehydration in both groups using receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves to determine the area under the curve (AUC).

RESULTS

We enrolled 73 children (male = 36) in the dehydration group and 143 (male = 105) in the comparison group. Median age was 32 months (range 3-214) in the dehydration and 96 months (range 2.6-214 months, p < 0.0001) in the trauma group. Median CDS was 3 (range 0-8) within the dehydration group and 0 in the comparison group (p < 0.0001). The following parameters were statistically significant (p < 0.05) between the comparison group and the dehydrated group: difference in heart rate, diastolic blood pressure, urine sodium/potassium ratio, urine sodium, fractional sodium excretion, serum bicarbonate, and creatinine measurements. The best markers for dehydration were urine Na and serum bicarbonate (ROC AUC = 0.798 and 0.821, respectively). CDS was most closely correlated with serum bicarbonate (Pearson r = -0.3696, p = 0.002).

CONCLUSION

Although serum bicarbonate is not the gold standard for dehydration, this study provides further evidence for the usefulness of the CDS as a dehydration marker in children.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

Registered at ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT00462527) on April 18, 2007.

摘要

背景

临床脱水量表(CDS)是一种快速、易用的工具,有 4 个临床项目,评分范围为 1-8,用于对患有肠胃炎的儿童进行脱水分类,分为无脱水、轻度脱水和中度/重度脱水。但仍缺乏对 CDS(Friedman JN)进行验证的研究。我们假设 CDS 与广泛的既定脱水标志物相关,因此它是一种合适且易于使用的临床工具。

方法

本研究设计为单中心、前瞻性、双队列试验。在一家三级护理中心,对需要静脉补液以纠正脱水的腹泻和呕吐患儿与需要静脉穿刺进行镇静的小创伤患者进行比较。我们使用受试者工作特征(ROC)曲线比较 CDS 与两组的临床和尿液标志物(尿液电解质、蛋白、比值和分数排泄)在脱水方面的相关性,以确定曲线下面积(AUC)。

结果

我们共纳入 73 名(男=36 名)脱水患儿和 143 名(男=105 名)小创伤患者。脱水组的中位年龄为 32 个月(范围 3-214 个月),创伤组为 96 个月(范围 2.6-214 个月,p<0.0001)。脱水组的 CDS 中位数为 3(范围 0-8),对照组为 0(p<0.0001)。与对照组相比,脱水组的以下参数有统计学意义(p<0.05):心率、舒张压、尿钠/钾比值、尿钠、钠分数排泄、血清碳酸氢盐和肌酐测量值。最能反映脱水的标志物是尿钠和血清碳酸氢盐(ROC AUC 分别为 0.798 和 0.821)。CDS 与血清碳酸氢盐的相关性最密切(Pearson r=-0.3696,p=0.002)。

结论

虽然血清碳酸氢盐不是脱水的金标准,但本研究进一步证明了 CDS 作为儿童脱水标志物的有用性。

试验注册

于 2007 年 4 月 18 日在 ClinicalTrials.gov(NCT00462527)注册。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/961c/4081489/a13d5937e3e8/1471-2431-14-149-1.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验