Atkinson M J, Caldwell L
Department of Psychiatry University of Calgary, Alberta, Canada.
J Affect Disord. 1997 Jul;44(2-3):169-75. doi: 10.1016/s0165-0327(97)00041-4.
The recent directives to improve both the quality and the efficiency of mental health service delivery systems have emphasized the need for evidence based treatment efficacy data, yet recent evidence suggests that quality of life data may be confounded with psychiatric symptomatology. The objective of the current inquiry was to determine whether responses to patient satisfaction measures are equally effected by mood-congruent response bias. Thirty-seven patients from a mood disorders clinic in an urban acute care hospital were asked to rate their current mood, satisfaction with their care, and quality of life. While patient rating of mood were highly correlated with specific quality of life scales and predicted 21% of the variance in global quality ratings, the more objective satisfaction indicators were not. For the clinician, these data suggest that clinically depressed patients may view their support system and care givers in negative or biased perspective.
近期关于提高心理健康服务提供系统质量和效率的指令强调了基于证据的治疗效果数据的必要性,但最近的证据表明生活质量数据可能与精神症状学相互混淆。本次调查的目的是确定对患者满意度测量的反应是否同样受到情绪一致反应偏差的影响。一家城市急症医院情绪障碍诊所的37名患者被要求对他们当前的情绪、对护理的满意度以及生活质量进行评分。虽然患者的情绪评分与特定的生活质量量表高度相关,并预测了全球质量评分中21%的方差,但更客观的满意度指标却并非如此。对于临床医生来说,这些数据表明临床抑郁症患者可能会以消极或有偏差的视角看待他们的支持系统和护理人员。