• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

在强化个案管理中增加消费者提供者:这会改善结果吗?

Adding consumer-providers to intensive case management: does it improve outcome?

作者信息

Rivera James J, Sullivan Ann M, Valenti S Stavros

机构信息

Department of Psychiatry, Mount Sinai School of Medicine, Elmhurst Hospital Center, Rm. H3-48, 79-01 Broadway, Elmhurst, NY 11373, USA.

出版信息

Psychiatr Serv. 2007 Jun;58(6):802-9. doi: 10.1176/ps.2007.58.6.802.

DOI:10.1176/ps.2007.58.6.802
PMID:17535940
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

Over the past decade, there has been increasing interest in the employment of mental health consumers in various roles as providers of services. Although integration of consumers into case management services has been studied, the roles of consumers have been poorly defined and the benefits have not been established. The goal of this study was to evaluate whether consumers enhance case management outcome through the provision of social support.

METHODS

This study compared consumer-assisted and non-consumer-assisted case management with standard clinic-based care. The consumer role focused on the development of social support by using peer staff who matched the profile of participants. A total of 203 clients with severe and persistent mental illness were randomly assigned to one of the three conditions and followed for 12 months.

RESULTS

All three programs yielded the same general pattern of improvement over time for symptoms, health care satisfaction, and quality of life. Clients in the three programs also showed similar but small changes in measures of social network behavior. Consumer-assisted case management was unique in its use of peer-organized activities. Non-consumer-assisted case management made greater use of individual contacts with professional staff. Standard clinic-based care relied more on group and on individual therapy. Despite these variations in the pattern of services over a 12-month period, no one program emerged as categorically superior to the others.

CONCLUSIONS

Although more research is needed to determine optimal roles for consumers in mental health service delivery, a randomized trial found no evidence that the presence of consumers enhances case management outcome.

摘要

目的

在过去十年中,人们越来越关注让精神健康消费者担任各种服务提供者的角色。尽管已经对消费者融入个案管理服务进行了研究,但消费者的角色定义不明确,其益处也尚未得到证实。本研究的目的是评估消费者是否通过提供社会支持来改善个案管理的结果。

方法

本研究将消费者协助的个案管理和非消费者协助的个案管理与基于诊所的标准护理进行了比较。消费者的角色侧重于通过使用与参与者特征相匹配的同伴工作人员来发展社会支持。共有203名患有严重持续性精神疾病的患者被随机分配到三种情况之一,并随访12个月。

结果

随着时间的推移,所有三个项目在症状、医疗保健满意度和生活质量方面都呈现出相同的总体改善模式。三个项目中的患者在社交网络行为指标上也显示出相似但微小的变化。消费者协助的个案管理在使用同伴组织的活动方面独具特色。非消费者协助的个案管理更多地利用与专业工作人员的个人联系。基于诊所的标准护理更多地依赖团体治疗和个体治疗。尽管在12个月的服务模式上存在这些差异,但没有一个项目明显优于其他项目。

结论

尽管需要更多研究来确定消费者在精神健康服务提供中的最佳角色,但一项随机试验没有发现证据表明消费者的参与能改善个案管理的结果。

相似文献

1
Adding consumer-providers to intensive case management: does it improve outcome?在强化个案管理中增加消费者提供者:这会改善结果吗?
Psychiatr Serv. 2007 Jun;58(6):802-9. doi: 10.1176/ps.2007.58.6.802.
2
Clinical case management of revolving door patients - a semi-randomized study.“旋转门”患者的临床病例管理——一项半随机研究。
Acta Psychiatr Scand. 2008 Jun;117(6):449-54. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0447.2008.01170.x. Epub 2008 Mar 10.
3
Consumer case management and attitudes concerning family relations among persons with mental illness.患有精神疾病者的消费者个案管理及对家庭关系的态度。
Psychiatr Q. 1995 Fall;66(3):249-61. doi: 10.1007/BF02265674.
4
Characteristics and activities of case managers in the RWJ Foundation Program on chronic mental illness.罗伯特·伍德·约翰逊基金会慢性精神疾病项目中个案管理员的特征与活动
Psychiatr Serv. 1996 Jul;47(7):737-43. doi: 10.1176/ps.47.7.737.
5
A study of client-focused case management and consumer advocacy: the Community and Consumer Service Project.一项以客户为中心的个案管理与消费者权益倡导研究:社区与消费者服务项目
Aust N Z J Psychiatry. 1999 Oct;33(5):684-93. doi: 10.1080/j.1440-1614.1999.00629.x.
6
Shared decision making in public mental health care: perspectives from consumers living with severe mental illness.公共精神卫生保健中的共享决策:来自患有严重精神疾病的消费者的观点。
Psychiatr Rehabil J. 2010 Summer;34(1):29-36. doi: 10.2975/34.1.2010.29.36.
7
The mental health expert patient: findings from a pilot study of a generic chronic condition self-management programme for people with mental illness.心理健康专家患者:一项针对患有精神疾病的人群的通用慢性病自我管理项目的试点研究结果。
Int J Soc Psychiatry. 2007 Jan;53(1):63-74. doi: 10.1177/0020764007075010.
8
Service use among patients with schizophrenia in psychoeducational multiple-family group treatment.精神分裂症患者在心理教育多家庭团体治疗中的服务利用情况。
Psychiatr Serv. 2002 Jun;53(6):749-54. doi: 10.1176/appi.ps.53.6.749.
9
Consumers as peer specialists on intensive case management teams: impact on client outcomes.作为强化个案管理团队中同伴专家的消费者:对客户结果的影响。
Psychiatr Serv. 1995 Oct;46(10):1037-44. doi: 10.1176/ps.46.10.1037.
10
Therapeutic limit setting in an assertive community treatment program.积极社区治疗项目中的治疗限度设定
Psychiatr Serv. 2000 Apr;51(4):499-505. doi: 10.1176/appi.ps.51.4.499.

引用本文的文献

1
Subjective experiences of an acceptance and mindfulness-based group intervention (Feel-Good-Group) in young people with early psychosis.针对早期精神病青年患者的一项基于接纳与正念的团体干预(感觉良好团体)的主观体验
Front Psychiatry. 2024 Oct 7;15:1369629. doi: 10.3389/fpsyt.2024.1369629. eCollection 2024.
2
Exploring the use of social network interventions for adults with mental health difficulties: a systematic review and narrative synthesis.探索社交网络干预措施在心理健康有困难的成年人中的应用:系统评价和叙述性综合。
BMC Psychiatry. 2023 Jul 7;23(1):486. doi: 10.1186/s12888-023-04881-y.
3
What is the volume, diversity and nature of recent, robust evidence for the use of peer support in health and social care? An evidence and gap map.
近期关于在健康和社会护理中使用同伴支持的有力证据的数量、多样性和性质是什么?一份证据与差距图。
Campbell Syst Rev. 2022 Jul 26;18(3):e1264. doi: 10.1002/cl2.1264. eCollection 2022 Sep.
4
Interventions for social and community participation for adults with intellectual disability, psychosocial disability or on the autism spectrum: An umbrella systematic review.针对智力残疾、心理社会残疾或自闭症谱系障碍成年人的社会和社区参与干预措施:一项综合性系统评价。
Front Rehabil Sci. 2022 Aug 19;3:935473. doi: 10.3389/fresc.2022.935473. eCollection 2022.
5
The effectiveness of peer support for individuals with mental illness: systematic review and meta-analysis.同伴支持对精神疾病患者的有效性:系统评价和荟萃分析。
Psychol Med. 2023 Aug;53(11):5332-5341. doi: 10.1017/S0033291722002422. Epub 2022 Sep 6.
6
Interventions to improve social circumstances of people with mental health conditions: a rapid evidence synthesis.改善心理健康状况人群社会环境的干预措施:快速证据综合评估。
BMC Psychiatry. 2022 Apr 28;22(1):302. doi: 10.1186/s12888-022-03864-9.
7
Assessing the effectiveness of social network interventions for adults with a diagnosis of mental health problems: a systematic review and narrative synthesis of impact.评估社交网络干预措施对有心理健康问题诊断的成年人的有效性:影响的系统评价和叙述性综合。
Soc Psychiatry Psychiatr Epidemiol. 2022 May;57(5):907-925. doi: 10.1007/s00127-022-02242-w. Epub 2022 Feb 9.
8
Employer and Co-worker Perspectives on Hiring and Working with People with Mental Health Conditions.雇主和同事对招聘和与心理健康状况人士共事的看法。
Community Ment Health J. 2022 Oct;58(7):1252-1267. doi: 10.1007/s10597-021-00934-2. Epub 2022 Jan 31.
9
Core Competencies to Promote Consistency and Standardization of Best Practices for Digital Peer Support: Focus Group Study.促进数字同伴支持最佳实践的一致性和标准化的核心能力:焦点小组研究
JMIR Ment Health. 2021 Dec 16;8(12):e30221. doi: 10.2196/30221.
10
Initial Training for Mental Health Peer Support Workers: Systematized Review and International Delphi Consultation.心理健康同伴支持工作者的初始培训:系统评价与国际德尔菲咨询
JMIR Ment Health. 2021 May 27;8(5):e25528. doi: 10.2196/25528.