• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

改善姑息治疗。

Improving palliative care.

作者信息

Meier D E, Morrison R S, Cassel C K

机构信息

Mount Sinai School of Medicine, New York, New York, USA.

出版信息

Ann Intern Med. 1997 Aug 1;127(3):225-30. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-127-3-199708010-00008.

DOI:10.7326/0003-4819-127-3-199708010-00008
PMID:9245229
Abstract

Although most deaths in the United States occur in hospitals, data suggest that hospitals and physicians are not equipped to handle the medical and psychosocial problems of dying patients. In this article, we review the barriers to achieving a peaceful death, including inadequate medical professional education on palliative care, and public and professional uncertainty about the difference between foregoing life-sustaining treatment and active euthanasia, and health professionals' difficulty recognizing when patients are dying and the associated sense that death is a professional failure. Other barriers include fiscal constraints on the length of stay, the number of nurses available to care for dying patients, legal and regulatory constraints on obtaining opioid prescriptions, and a segregated system of hospice care that requires patients to be separated from familiar health care providers and settings in order to receive palliative care at the end of life. Identifying the opportunities that can improve the delivery of palliative care at the end of life is the first step toward developing corrective approaches. Strategies that enhance these opportunities are proposed.

摘要

尽管美国的大多数死亡事件发生在医院,但数据表明,医院和医生并未做好应对临终患者医疗和心理社会问题的准备。在本文中,我们审视了实现安详死亡的障碍,包括姑息治疗方面医学专业教育不足、公众和专业人士对放弃维持生命治疗与主动安乐死之间差异的不确定性,以及卫生专业人员难以识别患者何时濒临死亡以及随之而来的认为死亡是专业失败的观念。其他障碍包括住院时长的财政限制、照顾临终患者的护士数量、获取阿片类药物处方的法律和监管限制,以及临终关怀的隔离体系,该体系要求患者与熟悉的医疗服务提供者和环境分离,以便在生命末期接受姑息治疗。识别可改善临终姑息治疗提供情况的机会是制定纠正措施的第一步。本文还提出了增强这些机会的策略。

相似文献

1
Improving palliative care.改善姑息治疗。
Ann Intern Med. 1997 Aug 1;127(3):225-30. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-127-3-199708010-00008.
2
Ensuring a good death.确保善终。
Bioethics Forum. 1997 Winter;13(4):7-17.
3
Are medical ethicists out of touch? Practitioner attitudes in the US and UK towards decisions at the end of life.医学伦理学家脱离实际了吗?美国和英国从业者对临终决策的态度。
J Med Ethics. 2000 Aug;26(4):254-60. doi: 10.1136/jme.26.4.254.
4
Exploratory study on end-of-life issues: barriers to palliative care and advance directives.临终问题的探索性研究:姑息治疗的障碍与预先指示
Am J Hosp Palliat Care. 2005 Mar-Apr;22(2):119-24. doi: 10.1177/104990910502200207.
5
Physician-assisted suicide: appellate court rulings.医生协助自杀:上诉法院裁决
Issues (St Louis Mo). 1996 Mar-Apr;11(2):1-8.
6
To care for the dying.关怀临终者。
Origins. 1997 Mar 20;26(39):640-8.
7
Palliative treatments of last resort: choosing the least harmful alternative. University of Pennsylvania Center for Bioethics Assisted Suicide Consensus Panel.最后的姑息治疗手段:选择危害最小的方案。宾夕法尼亚大学 生物伦理中心协助自杀共识小组
Ann Intern Med. 2000 Mar 21;132(6):488-93. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-132-6-200003210-00011.
8
Decisions near the end of life. Council on Ethical and Judicial Affairs, American Medical Association.临终决策。美国医学协会伦理与司法事务委员会
JAMA. 1992;267(16):2229-33.
9
Medical concerns about physician-assisted suicide.对医生协助自杀的医学担忧。
Seattle Univ Law Rev. 1995 Spring;18(3):521-30.
10
Slow euthanasia.缓慢安乐死
J Palliat Care. 1996 Winter;12(4):21-30.

引用本文的文献

1
Shared Decision Making to Support the Provision of Palliative and End-of-Life Care in the Emergency Department: A Consensus Statement and Research Agenda.急诊科姑息治疗和临终关怀的共同决策支持:共识声明与研究议程
Acad Emerg Med. 2016 Dec;23(12):1394-1402. doi: 10.1111/acem.13083. Epub 2016 Nov 25.
2
END OF LIFE CARE DECISIONS AND THE HOSPICE MOVEMENT.临终关怀决策与临终关怀运动
Med J Armed Forces India. 2002 Apr;58(2):149-51. doi: 10.1016/S0377-1237(02)80050-8. Epub 2011 Jul 21.
3
Letter to the editor.致编辑的信。
Med J Armed Forces India. 2012 Jul;68(3):269-70. doi: 10.1016/j.mjafi.2012.04.004.
4
Research priorities in geriatric palliative care: an introduction to a new series.老年姑息治疗的研究重点:新系列介绍
J Palliat Med. 2013 Jul;16(7):726-9. doi: 10.1089/jpm.2013.9499. Epub 2013 May 30.
5
The palliative care model for emergency department patients with advanced illness.晚期疾病急诊患者的姑息治疗模式。
J Palliat Med. 2011 Aug;14(8):945-50. doi: 10.1089/jpm.2011.0011. Epub 2011 Jul 18.
6
Effects of Palliative Care Training Program on Knowledge, Attitudes, Beliefs and Experiences Among Student Physiotherapists: A Preliminary Quasi-experimental Study.姑息治疗培训项目对物理治疗专业学生的知识、态度、信念和经历的影响:一项初步的准实验研究。
Indian J Palliat Care. 2011 Jan;17(1):47-53. doi: 10.4103/0973-1075.78449.
7
Physical therapy in palliative care: from symptom control to quality of life: a critical review.姑息治疗中的物理治疗:从症状控制到生活质量:一项批判性综述
Indian J Palliat Care. 2010 Sep;16(3):138-46. doi: 10.4103/0973-1075.73670.
8
Barriers to referral to inpatient palliative care units in Japan: a qualitative survey with content analysis.日本住院姑息治疗病房的转诊障碍:一项内容分析的定性调查
Support Care Cancer. 2008 Mar;16(3):217-22. doi: 10.1007/s00520-007-0215-1. Epub 2007 Feb 21.
9
Using rapid-cycle quality improvement methodology to reduce feeding tubes in patients with advanced dementia: before and after study.采用快速循环质量改进方法减少晚期痴呆患者的饲管使用:前后对照研究
BMJ. 2004 Aug 28;329(7464):491-4. doi: 10.1136/bmj.329.7464.491.
10
Consensus guidelines on analgesia and sedation in dying intensive care unit patients.关于重症监护病房临终患者镇痛与镇静的共识指南。
BMC Med Ethics. 2002 Aug 12;3:E3. doi: 10.1186/1472-6939-3-3.