Goldberg P A, Kamm M A, Nicholls R J, Morris G, Britton K E
Physiology Unit, St Mark's Hospital, London.
Gut. 1997 Jun;40(6):790-3. doi: 10.1136/gut.40.6.790.
To determine the contributions of gastrointestinal transit and pouch characteristics to bowel frequency in patients with an ileoanal reservoir and no pouchitis.
Twenty one patients who had undergone restorative proctocolectomy, with ileostomy closure at least eight months previously, and who had no history of pouchitis were recruited. They were prospectively classified on the basis of their bowel frequency: 11 patients had good pouch function (bowel frequency less than six per day) and 10 had poor function (bowel frequency more than six per day). Gastrointestinal transit was studied using a dual isotope technique and anal and pouch physiological examination was performed on all patients.
Lag phase, 25% and 50% gastric emptying, small bowel transit time, and 10% and 50% pouch filling times, all for solids and liquids, were not significantly different between patients with good and poor function. Anal manometry and pouch and anal electrical sensitivity were also similar in the two groups. The volume of air and water required to elicit an initial sensation and the urge to defaecate were similar in both groups, but the maximum tolerated volume to both air (525 v 245 ml, good v poor function, median values) and water (625 v 370 ml) infusion was significantly (both p < 0.02) lower in patients with poor function.
Maximum tolerated volume in the pouch, which may reflect pouch size, sensitivity, compliance, or a combination of these is the major determinant of pouch function. Gastrointestinal transit does not seem to be an important determinant of function.
确定胃肠传输和贮袋特征对无贮袋炎的回肠肛管贮袋患者排便频率的影响。
招募21例接受过直肠结肠切除重建术且回肠造口关闭至少8个月且无贮袋炎病史的患者。根据他们的排便频率进行前瞻性分类:11例患者贮袋功能良好(排便频率每天少于6次),10例患者功能较差(排便频率每天超过6次)。采用双同位素技术研究胃肠传输,并对所有患者进行肛门和贮袋生理检查。
固体和液体的延迟期、25%和50%胃排空、小肠传输时间以及10%和50%贮袋充盈时间,在功能良好和功能较差的患者之间均无显著差异。两组的肛门测压以及贮袋和肛门电敏感性也相似。引起初始感觉和排便冲动所需的空气和水的量在两组中相似,但功能较差的患者对空气(525对245 ml,功能良好对功能较差,中位数)和水(625对370 ml)灌注的最大耐受量均显著较低(p均<0.02)。
贮袋中的最大耐受量可能反映贮袋大小、敏感性、顺应性或这些因素的组合,是贮袋功能的主要决定因素。胃肠传输似乎不是功能的重要决定因素。