Gu C, Rao D C
Division of Biostatistics, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO 63110, USA.
Am J Hum Genet. 1997 Jul;61(1):211-22. doi: 10.1086/513909.
We are concerned here with practical issues in the application of extreme sib-pair (ESP) methods to quantitative traits. Two important factors-namely, the way extreme trait values are defined and the proportions in which different types of ESPs are pooled, in the analysis-are shown to determine the power and the cost effectiveness of a study design. We found that, in general, combining reasonable numbers of both extremely discordant and extremely concordant sib pairs that were available in the sample is more powerful and more cost effective than pursuing only a single type of ESP. We also found that dividing trait values with a less extreme threshold at one end or at both ends of the trait distribution leads to more cost-effective designs. The notion of generalized relative risk ratios (the lambda methods, as described in the first part of this series of two articles) is used to calculate the power and sample size for various choices of polychotomization of trait values and for the combination of different types of ESPs. A balance then can be struck among these choices, to attain an optimum design.
我们在此关注的是将极端同胞对(ESP)方法应用于数量性状时的实际问题。分析中两个重要因素,即极端性状值的定义方式以及不同类型的ESP合并的比例,被证明决定了研究设计的效能和成本效益。我们发现,一般来说,将样本中可用的合理数量的极端不一致和极端一致的同胞对结合起来,比只采用单一类型的ESP更有效能且更具成本效益。我们还发现,在性状分布的一端或两端用不太极端的阈值划分性状值会产生更具成本效益的设计。广义相对风险比的概念(如本系列两篇文章第一部分所述的λ方法)用于计算性状值多分类的各种选择以及不同类型ESP组合的效能和样本量。然后可以在这些选择之间取得平衡,以获得最优设计。