Crenshaw B S, Ward S R, Granger C B, Stebbins A L, Topol E J, Califf R M
Duke Clinical Research Institute, Durham, North Carolina.
J Am Coll Cardiol. 1997 Aug;30(2):406-13. doi: 10.1016/s0735-1097(97)00194-0.
We examined the clinical predictors and angiographic and clinical outcomes associated with atrial fibrillation in the setting of acute myocardial infarction (MI).
This condition has been studied primarily in prethrombolytic era small trials.
We compared baseline clinical characteristics, short-term clinical and angiographic outcomes and 1-year mortality of patients enrolled in the Global Utilization of Streptokinase and TPA for Occluded Coronary Arteries (GUSTO-I) trial with atrial fibrillation on admission electrocardiography (n = 1,026 [2.5%]) or after enrollment (n = 3,254 [7.9%]) and those without atrial fibrillation (n = 36,611 [89.6%]). Univariable and multivariable analyses were used to assess relations between baseline factors and the development of atrial fibrillation.
Patients with any atrial fibrillation more often had three-vessel coronary artery disease and initial Thrombolysis in Myocardial Infarction (TIMI) grade < 3 flow than those without the arrhythmia. In-hospital stroke was increased in patients with atrial fibrillation (3.1% vs. 1.3%, p = 0.0001), mainly ischemic stroke (1.8% vs. 0.5%, p = 0.0001). Significant multivariable predictors of later atrial fibrillation included advanced age, higher peak creatine kinase levels, worse Killip class and increased heart rate. The unadjusted mortality rate was significantly higher at 30 days (14.3% vs. 6.2%, p = 0.0001) and at 1 year (21.5% vs. 8.6%, p < 0.0001) in patients with atrial fibrillation. The adjusted 30-day mortality rate remained significantly higher with any (odds ratio [OR] 1.3, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.2 to 1.4) or later (OR 1.4, 95% CI 1.3 to 1.5) atrial fibrillation but not with baseline atrial fibrillation (OR 1.1, 95% CI 0.88 to 1.3).
Atrial fibrillation in the setting of acute MI independently predicts stroke and 30-day mortality. More aggressive treatment strategies in this subgroup may be warranted and deserve further study.
我们研究了急性心肌梗死(MI)时心房颤动的临床预测因素以及与之相关的血管造影和临床结局。
这种情况主要是在溶栓治疗前时代的小型试验中进行研究的。
我们比较了全球应用链激酶和组织型纤溶酶原激活剂治疗闭塞冠状动脉(GUSTO-I)试验中,入院心电图显示有心房颤动(n = 1,026 [2.5%])或入组后出现心房颤动(n = 3,254 [7.9%])的患者与无心房颤动患者(n = 36,611 [89.6%])的基线临床特征、短期临床和血管造影结局以及1年死亡率。采用单变量和多变量分析来评估基线因素与心房颤动发生之间的关系。
与无心律失常的患者相比,任何心房颤动患者更常患有三支冠状动脉疾病且初始心肌梗死溶栓(TIMI)血流分级<3级。心房颤动患者的院内卒中发生率增加(3.1%对1.3%,p = 0.0001),主要是缺血性卒中(1.8%对0.5%,p = 0.0001)。晚期心房颤动的显著多变量预测因素包括高龄、更高的肌酸激酶峰值水平、更差的Killip分级和心率增加。心房颤动患者在30天时(14.3%对6.2%,p = 0.0001)和1年时(21.5%对8.6%,p < 0.0001)的未调整死亡率显著更高。有任何心房颤动(比值比[OR] 1.3,95%置信区间[CI] 1.2至1.4)或晚期心房颤动(OR 1.4,95% CI 1.3至1.5)时,调整后的30天死亡率仍然显著更高,但基线心房颤动时并非如此(OR 1.1,95% CI 0.88至1.3)。
急性心肌梗死时的心房颤动独立预测卒中及30天死亡率。对于该亚组患者,可能需要更积极的治疗策略,值得进一步研究。