Suppr超能文献

宫颈采样中宫颈刷与阴道-宫颈-宫颈管(VCE)三联涂片技术的比较。

Cervex brush versus vaginal-cervical-endocervical (VCE) triple smear techniques in cervical sampling.

作者信息

Järvi K

机构信息

Department of Pathology, HEMO OY Medical Centre, Lahti, Finland.

出版信息

Cytopathology. 1997 Aug;8(4):282-8. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2303.1997.5582055.x.

Abstract

Cervex brush sampling was compared with the conventional triple vaginal-cervical-endocervical (VCE) smear technique. Nine hundred and fifty-nine Cervex brush smears and 1064 VCE smears were studied. All smears with both methods were technically satisfactory for evaluation. Endocervical cells were found in 90.7% and metaplastic cells in 73.3% of Cervex brush samples and in 92.5% and 64.1% of VCE samples, respectively. There were significantly more metaplastic cells in smears from premenopausal women. Low grade squamous intraepithelial lesion (SIL) was found in three Cervex brush samples and in two VCE samples. High-grade SIL was found only in one Cervex brush sample. Benign cellular changes were found in 142 Cervex brush samples and in 144 VCE samples. Sampling with the Cervex brush is efficient, simple and fast and gives high quality cervical smears for cytological evaluation.

摘要

将宫颈刷取样与传统的阴道-宫颈-宫颈管三联涂片技术(VCE)进行了比较。研究了959份宫颈刷涂片和1064份VCE涂片。两种方法的所有涂片在技术上均适合评估。宫颈管细胞在宫颈刷样本中的检出率为90.7%,化生细胞为73.3%;在VCE样本中,宫颈管细胞和化生细胞的检出率分别为92.5%和64.1%。绝经前女性涂片中的化生细胞明显更多。在3份宫颈刷样本和2份VCE样本中发现了低级别鳞状上皮内病变(SIL)。高级别SIL仅在1份宫颈刷样本中发现。在142份宫颈刷样本和144份VCE样本中发现了良性细胞变化。使用宫颈刷取样高效、简单、快速,能提供高质量的宫颈涂片用于细胞学评估。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验