Overall J E
Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, University of Texas School at Houston, USA.
J Biopharm Stat. 1997 Jul;7(3):383-402. doi: 10.1080/10543409708835195.
The implications of drop-outs for power of random regression model (RRM) tests of significance for differences in the rate of change produced by two treatments in a randomized parallel-groups design were investigated by Monte Carlo simulation methods. The two-stage RRM fitted a least squares linear regression equation to all of the available data for each individual, and then ANOVA or ANCOVA tests of significance were applied to the resulting slope coefficients. The tests of significance were adequately protected against type I error, but power was seriously eroded by the presence of drop-outs. Simple endpoint analyses with baseline and time-in-treatment covaried proved more robust against the power degradations.
通过蒙特卡罗模拟方法,研究了在随机平行组设计中,失访对两种治疗方法产生的变化率差异的随机回归模型(RRM)显著性检验功效的影响。两阶段RRM对每个个体的所有可用数据拟合了最小二乘线性回归方程,然后对所得斜率系数进行方差分析或协方差分析显著性检验。显著性检验能充分控制I型错误,但失访的存在严重削弱了功效。事实证明,将基线和治疗时间作为协变量的简单终点分析对功效降低更具稳健性。