Zeisler H, Joura E A, Bancher-Todesca D, Hanzal E, Gitsch G
Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, University of Vienna, Vienna General Hospital, Austria.
J Reprod Med. 1997 Jul;42(7):390-2.
To evaluate the effect of prophylactic cerclage on the course of pregnancy in women with prior conization.
In a retrospective, observational study, the outcome of pregnancies in 69 women with (n = 30) and without (n = 39) cerclage who previously underwent conization was evaluated regarding hospitalization due to threatened preterm labor and delivery before 37 weeks of gestation.
The occurrence of preterm delivery was 23.3% in the cerclage group and 20.5% in the control group (P = .78). Women with prophylactic cerclage were hospitalized significantly more often due to threatened premature labor: with cerclage, 66.7%; without cerclage, 33.3% (P = .006).
Prophylactic cerclage should be used more sparingly in women with a history of conization because it does not prevent premature delivery and tends to induce preterm uterine contractions.
评估预防性宫颈环扎术对既往有宫颈锥切术史女性妊娠过程的影响。
在一项回顾性观察研究中,对69例既往接受过宫颈锥切术的女性的妊娠结局进行评估,其中30例接受了宫颈环扎术,39例未接受宫颈环扎术,评估因先兆早产住院情况及妊娠37周前分娩情况。
宫颈环扎术组早产发生率为23.3%,对照组为20.5%(P = 0.78)。预防性宫颈环扎术的女性因先兆早产住院的频率显著更高:有宫颈环扎术者为66.7%;无宫颈环扎术者为33.3%(P = 0.006)。
对于有宫颈锥切术史的女性,应更谨慎地使用预防性宫颈环扎术,因为它不能预防早产,且倾向于诱发子宫早产收缩。