Suppr超能文献

孕期预防性宫颈环扎术。对有宫颈锥切史女性的影响。

Prophylactic cerclage in pregnancy. Effect in women with a history of conization.

作者信息

Zeisler H, Joura E A, Bancher-Todesca D, Hanzal E, Gitsch G

机构信息

Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, University of Vienna, Vienna General Hospital, Austria.

出版信息

J Reprod Med. 1997 Jul;42(7):390-2.

PMID:9252928
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the effect of prophylactic cerclage on the course of pregnancy in women with prior conization.

STUDY DESIGN

In a retrospective, observational study, the outcome of pregnancies in 69 women with (n = 30) and without (n = 39) cerclage who previously underwent conization was evaluated regarding hospitalization due to threatened preterm labor and delivery before 37 weeks of gestation.

RESULTS

The occurrence of preterm delivery was 23.3% in the cerclage group and 20.5% in the control group (P = .78). Women with prophylactic cerclage were hospitalized significantly more often due to threatened premature labor: with cerclage, 66.7%; without cerclage, 33.3% (P = .006).

CONCLUSION

Prophylactic cerclage should be used more sparingly in women with a history of conization because it does not prevent premature delivery and tends to induce preterm uterine contractions.

摘要

目的

评估预防性宫颈环扎术对既往有宫颈锥切术史女性妊娠过程的影响。

研究设计

在一项回顾性观察研究中,对69例既往接受过宫颈锥切术的女性的妊娠结局进行评估,其中30例接受了宫颈环扎术,39例未接受宫颈环扎术,评估因先兆早产住院情况及妊娠37周前分娩情况。

结果

宫颈环扎术组早产发生率为23.3%,对照组为20.5%(P = 0.78)。预防性宫颈环扎术的女性因先兆早产住院的频率显著更高:有宫颈环扎术者为66.7%;无宫颈环扎术者为33.3%(P = 0.006)。

结论

对于有宫颈锥切术史的女性,应更谨慎地使用预防性宫颈环扎术,因为它不能预防早产,且倾向于诱发子宫早产收缩。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验