• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

重症医学科中的经皮扩张气管切开术

Percutaneous dilatational tracheostomy in a medical ICU.

作者信息

Petros S, Engelmann L

机构信息

Abteilung für Intensivmedizin, Universität Leipzig, Germany.

出版信息

Intensive Care Med. 1997 Jun;23(6):630-4. doi: 10.1007/s001340050385.

DOI:10.1007/s001340050385
PMID:9255641
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the safety of percutaneous dilatational tracheostomy.

DESIGN

A prospective clinical study.

SETTING

The intensive care unit of a university medical clinic.

PATIENTS

137 critically ill patients admitted between May 1993 and September 1996.

INTERVENTION

Percutaneous dilatational tracheostomy at the bedside.

RESULTS

The median duration of translaryngeal intubation prior to tracheostomy was 8 days. Tracheostomy was carried out within 12.8 min (range 7-30 min). Acute complications were documented in 11.0% of the patients. There was one case of severe bleeding with transient asphyxia. Four patients had tracheal mucosal laceration treated conservatively. The postoperative in-hospital complication rate was 5.1%, the sole problem being stomal bleeding. Only two cases of stomal infection were documented. There was no procedure-related mortality.

CONCLUSION

In the hands of the experienced, percutaneous dilatational tracheostomy is a safe and quick bedside procedure. It is also less expensive and incurs minimal stress for the patient compared with the surgical method. The technique can be easily mastered by non-surgical physicians and we feel that it is the method of choice for elective tracheostomy in the majority of intensive care patients.

摘要

目的

评估经皮扩张气管切开术的安全性。

设计

一项前瞻性临床研究。

地点

一所大学医学诊所的重症监护病房。

患者

1993年5月至1996年9月期间收治的137例重症患者。

干预措施

在床边进行经皮扩张气管切开术。

结果

气管切开术前经喉插管的中位持续时间为8天。气管切开术在12.8分钟内完成(范围7 - 30分钟)。11.0%的患者记录有急性并发症。有1例严重出血伴短暂窒息。4例气管黏膜撕裂伤采用保守治疗。术后院内并发症发生率为5.1%,唯一问题是造口出血。仅记录到2例造口感染。无手术相关死亡病例。

结论

在经验丰富者手中,经皮扩张气管切开术是一种安全、快速的床边操作。与手术方法相比,它成本更低,对患者造成的应激也最小。非外科医生可轻松掌握该技术,我们认为它是大多数重症监护患者择期气管切开术的首选方法。

相似文献

1
Percutaneous dilatational tracheostomy in a medical ICU.重症医学科中的经皮扩张气管切开术
Intensive Care Med. 1997 Jun;23(6):630-4. doi: 10.1007/s001340050385.
2
Percutaneous Dilatational Tracheostomy via Griggs Technique.经皮扩张气管切开术(Griggs 技术)。
Arch Iran Med. 2017 Jan;20(1):49-54.
3
Percutaneous dilatational tracheostomy. A safe, cost-effective bedside procedure.经皮扩张气管切开术。一种安全、经济高效的床边操作。
Arch Surg. 1996 Mar;131(3):265-71. doi: 10.1001/archsurg.1996.01430150043008.
4
Predictors of difficulty in bedside percutaneous dilatational tracheostomy: pilot study.床边经皮扩张气管切开术困难程度的预测因素:初步研究
Rev Col Bras Cir. 2020;47:e20202510. doi: 10.1590/0100-6991e-20202510. Epub 2020 Jul 10.
5
Percutaneous tracheostomy: a 6 yr prospective evaluation of the single tapered dilator technique.经皮气管切开术:单斜面扩张器技术的 6 年前瞻性评估。
Br J Anaesth. 2010 Dec;105(6):782-8. doi: 10.1093/bja/aeq238. Epub 2010 Sep 2.
6
Percutaneous dilatational tracheostomy in the ICU: optimal organization, low complication rates, and description of a new complication.重症监护病房中的经皮扩张气管切开术:优化组织、低并发症发生率及一种新并发症的描述
Chest. 2003 May;123(5):1595-602. doi: 10.1378/chest.123.5.1595.
7
Open versus percutaneous dilatational tracheostomy: efficacy and cost analysis.开放性与经皮扩张气管切开术:疗效与成本分析
Am Surg. 2001 Apr;67(4):297-301; discussion 301-2.
8
Percutaneous tracheostomy: a clinical comparison of dilatational (Ciaglia) and translaryngeal (Fantoni) techniques.经皮气管切开术:扩张法(Ciaglia法)与经喉法(Fantoni法)的临床比较
Anesth Analg. 1999 Oct;89(4):938-43. doi: 10.1097/00000539-199910000-00022.
9
[Percutaneous dilatational tracheostomy].经皮扩张气管切开术
Med Klin (Munich). 1999 Apr;94(1 Spec No):51-4.
10
Impact of real-time ultrasound guidance on complications of percutaneous dilatational tracheostomy: a propensity score analysis.实时超声引导对经皮扩张气管切开术并发症的影响:一项倾向评分分析。
Crit Care. 2015 Apr 29;19(1):198. doi: 10.1186/s13054-015-0924-7.

引用本文的文献

1
Safety and feasibility of hybrid tracheostomy.混合式气管切开术的安全性与可行性
Acute Crit Care. 2021 Nov;36(4):369-373. doi: 10.4266/acc.2021.00801. Epub 2021 Nov 26.
2
Comparison of outcomes between vertical and transverse skin incisions in percutaneous tracheostomy for critically ill patients: a retrospective cohort study.经皮气管切开术中外切口与横切口对危重症患者结局的比较:一项回顾性队列研究。
Crit Care. 2018 Sep 30;22(1):246. doi: 10.1186/s13054-018-2174-y.
3
Percutaneous techniques versus surgical techniques for tracheostomy.
经皮气管切开术与外科气管切开术的比较
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2016 Jul 20;7(7):CD008045. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD008045.pub2.
4
Comparison of complications in percutaneous dilatational tracheostomy versus surgical tracheostomy.经皮扩张气管切开术与外科气管切开术并发症的比较。
Glob J Health Sci. 2014 Apr 20;6(4):221-5. doi: 10.5539/gjhs.v6n4p221.
5
Evolution of percutaneous dilatational tracheostomy--a review of current techniques and their pitfalls.经皮扩张气管切开术的演变——对当前技术及其缺陷的综述。
World J Surg. 2013 Jul;37(7):1633-46. doi: 10.1007/s00268-013-2025-6.
6
Experience with two different techniques of percutaneous dilational tracheostomy in 54 neurosurgical patients.54例神经外科患者采用两种不同经皮扩张气管切开术技术的经验。
Neurosurg Rev. 2003 Jul;26(3):188-91. doi: 10.1007/s10143-002-0248-3. Epub 2003 Feb 1.
7
Percutaneous tracheostomy.经皮气管切开术
Crit Care. 1999;3(2):R5-R10. doi: 10.1186/cc340.
8
Percutaneous tracheostomy: comparison of Ciaglia and Griggs techniques.经皮气管切开术:Ciaglia技术与Griggs技术的比较
Crit Care. 2000;4(2):124-8. doi: 10.1186/cc667. Epub 2000 Mar 3.
9
Percutaneous dilatational tracheostomy--early results and long-term outcome of 326 critically ill patients.经皮扩张气管切开术——326例危重症患者的早期结果和长期预后
Intensive Care Med. 1998 Jul;24(7):685-90. doi: 10.1007/s001340050645.