Suppr超能文献

荷兰老年患者群体中利尿剂的使用和撤药模式。

Diuretic usage and withdrawal patterns in a Dutch geriatric patient population.

作者信息

van Kraaij D J, Jansen R W, Bruijns E, Gribnau F W, Hoefnagels W H

机构信息

Department of Geriatric Medicine, University Hospital Nijmegen, The Netherlands.

出版信息

J Am Geriatr Soc. 1997 Aug;45(8):918-22. doi: 10.1111/j.1532-5415.1997.tb02959.x.

Abstract

OBJECTIVES

To describe diuretic usage and withdrawal patterns in a population of very old geriatric patients and to evaluate the long-term probability of remaining free from diuretic therapy after withdrawal.

DESIGN

Retrospective analysis of medical records and 1-year follow-up study.

SETTING

University Hospital Nijmegen and Rijnstate Hospital Arnhem, a non-academic teaching hospital, The Netherlands.

PARTICIPANTS

All 1547 patients, aged 75 years or older, visiting geriatric medicine departments in the two hospitals for the first time in the years 1990 through 1993.

MEASUREMENTS

Data on medical history, physical examinations, and medication use were obtained from medical records. Diuretic withdrawal and motivation was recorded as reported. Record review indicating diuretic withdrawal prompted a 1-year follow-up investigation and collection of additional updated information from family care and/or nursing-home physicians.

RESULTS

A total of 593 three patients (38.3%) were using diuretics. Use of diuretics increased with age from 33.6% in patients aged 75 to 79 years to 47.4% in patients aged 90 years or older (P < .05). Diuretics were withdrawn in 218 patients (36.8%), in 101 patients because of doubts about the initial or persistent indication for diuretic use and in 91 patients because of adverse effects. No reasons for withdrawal were reported in 26 patients. Withdrawal of diuretics was attempted more often in cases of diuretic prescriptions for unknown reasons (51.2%) or ankle edema without heart failure (45.0%) than when prescriptions were for heart failure (28.5%) or hypertension (35.4%). The overall probability of remaining free of diuretic therapy for 1 year was 0.41. Success of diuretic withdrawal was significantly less when congestive heart failure was the initial indication for prescription (probability 0.24). We did not find other clinical parameters related to the success of withdrawal.

CONCLUSIONS

Our study demonstrates that diuretic therapy can be withdrawn for at least a 1-year period in a substantial number of very old geriatric patients receiving these medications, regardless of the initial indications for prescription. However, withdrawal is performed without application of uniform criteria. Future prospective studies should be directed at developing clear guidelines for diuretic withdrawal in order to facilitate identification of eligible patients and to further improve the success of withdrawal attempts.

摘要

目的

描述高龄老年患者群体中利尿剂的使用及停用模式,并评估停用后长期不使用利尿剂治疗的可能性。

设计

病历回顾性分析及1年随访研究。

地点

荷兰奈梅亨大学医学中心和阿纳姆莱茵斯泰特医院(一家非学术性教学医院)。

研究对象

1990年至1993年间首次就诊于这两家医院老年医学科的所有1547例年龄在75岁及以上的患者。

测量指标

从病历中获取病史、体格检查及用药情况的数据。按照报告记录利尿剂停用情况及停用动机。记录复查显示利尿剂停用后,进行为期1年的随访调查,并从家庭护理医生和/或养老院医生处收集更多更新信息。

结果

共有593例患者(38.3%)正在使用利尿剂。利尿剂的使用随年龄增长而增加,75至79岁患者中为33.6%,90岁及以上患者中为47.4%(P < 0.05)。218例患者(36.8%)停用了利尿剂,其中101例是因为对最初或持续使用利尿剂的指征存在疑问,91例是因为不良反应。26例患者未报告停用原因。因不明原因开具利尿剂处方(51.2%)或无心力衰竭的踝部水肿(45.0%)而停用利尿剂的尝试比因心力衰竭(28.5%)或高血压(35.4%)开具处方时更频繁。1年内未使用利尿剂治疗的总体概率为0.41。当充血性心力衰竭是最初的处方指征时,利尿剂停用成功的概率显著降低(概率为0.24)。我们未发现与停用成功相关的其他临床参数。

结论

我们的研究表明,在大量接受这些药物治疗的高龄老年患者中,利尿剂治疗至少可停用1年,无论最初的处方指征如何。然而,停用是在没有统一标准的情况下进行的。未来的前瞻性研究应致力于制定明确的利尿剂停用指南,以便于识别符合条件的患者,并进一步提高停用尝试的成功率。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验