Suppr超能文献

芬兰医院出院登记册中冠心病数据的有效性。

The validity of hospital discharge register data on coronary heart disease in Finland.

作者信息

Mähönen M, Salomaa V, Brommels M, Molarius A, Miettinen H, Pyörälä K, Tuomilehto J, Arstila M, Kaarsalo E, Ketonen M, Kuulasmaa K, Lehto S, Mustaniemi H, Niemelä M, Palomäki P, Torppa J, Vuorenmaa T

机构信息

National Public Health Institute, Department of Epidemiology and Health Promotion, Helsinki, Finland.

出版信息

Eur J Epidemiol. 1997 Jun;13(4):403-15. doi: 10.1023/a:1007306110822.

Abstract

We studied the validity of the Finnish hospital discharge register data on coronary heart disease (CHD) for the purposes of epidemiologic studies and health services research. The Finnish nationwide hospital discharge register (HDR) was linked with the FINMONICA acute myocardial infarction (AMI) register for the years 1983-1990. The frequency of errors in the HDR was assessed separately. Between 8% and 13% of hospitalized AMI events registered in the AMI Register were not found in the HDR with an ICD code for CHD. Problems with the register linkage and the use of some ICD code other than one of the codes for CHD explained these missing events. The frequency of errors in the personal identification number was about 5% in the early 1980s. After 1986 errors were found only occasionally. The diagnosis recorded in the HDR was the same as that in the discharge sheet in about 95% of hospitalizations. The positive predictive value of the ICD code 410 (AMI), compared with the FINMONICA definite+possible AMI category, was very high and stable, about 90% in all areas and all hospitals, but the sensitivity varied from 50% at local hospitals to 80% at central hospitals. In summary, data on CHD obtained from the Finnish hospital discharge register give, on average, a correct picture on changes in the occurrence of AMI in Finland and can, with necessary caution, be used in epidemiological studies and health services research. However, the classification of individual cases is not standardized in the HDR, but varies over time, between geographical areas and the levels of care. Therefore, these data should not be used without confirmation in studies where correct classification of individual outcomes is of crucial importance, such as follow-up studies and case-control studies.

摘要

我们研究了芬兰医院出院登记数据在冠心病(CHD)流行病学研究和卫生服务研究中的有效性。1983 - 1990年期间,芬兰全国医院出院登记册(HDR)与芬兰人群心血管疾病监测(FINMONICA)急性心肌梗死(AMI)登记册相链接。我们分别评估了HDR中的错误频率。在AMI登记册中登记的住院AMI事件中,有8%至13%未在HDR中找到CHD的国际疾病分类(ICD)编码。登记链接问题以及使用CHD编码以外的某些ICD编码解释了这些缺失事件。20世纪80年代初,个人识别码的错误频率约为5%。1986年以后,仅偶尔发现错误。在约95%的住院病例中,HDR中记录的诊断与出院小结中的诊断相同。与FINMONICA明确+可能的AMI类别相比,ICD编码410(AMI)的阳性预测值非常高且稳定,在所有地区和所有医院约为90%,但敏感性从地方医院的50%到中心医院的80%不等。总之,从芬兰医院出院登记册获得的CHD数据平均能正确反映芬兰AMI发病率的变化,并且在必要时谨慎使用可用于流行病学研究和卫生服务研究。然而,HDR中个体病例的分类并不标准化,而是随时间、地理区域和护理水平而变化。因此,在个体结局正确分类至关重要的研究中,如随访研究和病例对照研究,在未经确认的情况下不应使用这些数据。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验