Suppr超能文献

世界卫生组织MONICA项目中的心肌梗死与冠心病死亡情况。来自四大洲21个国家38个人群的登记程序、事件发生率及病死率。

Myocardial infarction and coronary deaths in the World Health Organization MONICA Project. Registration procedures, event rates, and case-fatality rates in 38 populations from 21 countries in four continents.

作者信息

Tunstall-Pedoe H, Kuulasmaa K, Amouyel P, Arveiler D, Rajakangas A M, Pajak A

机构信息

Cardiovascular Epidemiology Unit, University of Dundee, Ninewells Hospital, Scotland, UK.

出版信息

Circulation. 1994 Jul;90(1):583-612. doi: 10.1161/01.cir.90.1.583.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

The WHO MONICA Project is a 10-year study that monitors deaths due to coronary heart disease (CHD), acute myocardial infarction, coronary care, and risk factors in men and women aged 35 to 64 years in defined communities. This analysis of methods and results of coronary event registration in 1985 through 1987 provides data on the relation between CHD morbidity and mortality.

METHODS AND RESULTS

Fatal and nonfatal coronary events were monitored through population-based registers. Hospital cases were found by pursuing admissions ("hot pursuit") or by retrospective analysis of discharges ("cold pursuit"). Availability of diagnostic data on identified nonfatal myocardial infarction was good. Information on fatal events (deaths occurring within 28 days) was limited and constrained in some populations by problems with access to sources such as death certificates. Age-standardized annual event rates for the main diagnostic group in men aged 35 to 64 covered a 12-fold range from 915 per 100,000 for North Karelia, Finland, to 76 per 100,000 for Beijing, China. For women, rates covered an 8.5-fold range from 256 per 100,000 for Glasgow, UK, to 30 per 100,000 for Catalonia, Spain. Twenty-eight-day case-fatality rates ranged from 37% to 81% for men (average, 48% to 49%), and from 31% to 91% for women (average, 54%). There was no significant correlation across populations for men between coronary event and case-fatality rates (r = -.04), the percentages of coronary deaths known to have occurred within 1 hour of onset (r = .08), or the percentages of known first events (r = -.23). Event and case-fatality rates for women correlated strongly with those for men in the same populations (r = .85, r = .80). Case-fatality rates for women were not consistently higher than those for men. For women, there was a significant inverse correlation between event and case-fatality rates (r = -.33, P < .05), suggesting that nonfatal events were being missed where event rates were low. Rankings based on MONICA categories of fatal events placed some middle- and low-mortality populations, such as the French, systematically higher than they would be based on official CHD mortality rates. However, rates for nonfatal myocardial infarction correlated quite well with the official mortality rates for CHD for the same populations. For men (age 35 to 64 years), approximately 1.5 (at low event rates) to 1 (at high event rates) episode of hospitalized, nonfatal, definite myocardial infarction was registered for every death due to CHD. The problem in categorizing deaths due to CHD was the large proportion of deaths with no relevant clinical or autopsy information. Unclassifiable deaths averaged 22% across the 38 populations but represented half of all registered deaths in 2 populations and a third or more of all deaths in 15 populations.

CONCLUSIONS

The WHO MONICA Project, although designed to study longitudinal trends within populations, provides the opportunity for relating rates of validated CHD deaths to nonfatal myocardial infarction across populations. There are major differences between populations in nonfatal as well as fatal coronary event rates. They refute suggestions that high CHD mortality rates are associated with high case-fatality rates or a relative excess of sudden deaths. The high proportion of CHD deaths for which no diagnostic information is available is a cause for concern.

摘要

背景

世界卫生组织(WHO)的莫尼卡项目是一项为期10年的研究,旨在监测特定社区中35至64岁男性和女性因冠心病(CHD)、急性心肌梗死、冠心病护理及危险因素导致的死亡情况。对1985年至1987年冠心病事件登记方法和结果的分析提供了关于冠心病发病率和死亡率关系的数据。

方法与结果

通过基于人群的登记系统监测致命和非致命的冠心病事件。通过追踪入院情况(“热追踪”)或对出院记录进行回顾性分析(“冷追踪”)来发现医院病例。已确诊的非致命性心肌梗死的诊断数据可得性良好。关于致命事件(发病28天内死亡)的信息有限,在一些人群中,由于获取死亡证明等来源存在问题而受到限制。35至64岁男性主要诊断组的年龄标准化年事件发生率范围为12倍,从芬兰北卡累利阿的每10万人915例到中国北京的每10万人76例。女性的发生率范围为8.5倍,从英国格拉斯哥的每10万人256例到西班牙加泰罗尼亚的每10万人30例。男性的28天病死率在37%至81%之间(平均为48%至49%),女性在31%至91%之间(平均为54%)。不同人群中,男性的冠心病事件发生率与病死率(r = -0.04)、已知在发病1小时内发生的冠心病死亡百分比(r = 0.08)或已知首发事件的百分比(r = -0.23)之间均无显著相关性。同一人群中女性的事件发生率和病死率与男性的相关性很强(r = 0.85,r = 0.80)。女性的病死率并非始终高于男性。对于女性,事件发生率与病死率之间存在显著负相关(r = -0.33,P < 0.05),这表明在事件发生率较低的地区,非致命事件可能被漏报。基于莫尼卡项目致命事件分类的排名显示,一些中低死亡率人群,如法国人,其排名系统性地高于基于官方冠心病死亡率的排名。然而,非致命性心肌梗死的发生率与同一人群的官方冠心病死亡率相关性较好。对于35至64岁的男性,每例冠心病死亡大约对应1.5例(事件发生率低时)至1例(事件发生率高时)住院的、非致命的、确诊的心肌梗死病例。对冠心病死亡进行分类时存在的问题是,很大一部分死亡病例没有相关的临床或尸检信息。在38个人群中,无法分类的死亡病例平均占22%,但在2个人群中占所有登记死亡病例的一半,在15个人群中占所有死亡病例的三分之一或更多。

结论

世界卫生组织的莫尼卡项目虽然旨在研究人群中的纵向趋势,但也提供了一个机会,可用于比较不同人群中经证实的冠心病死亡发生率与非致命性心肌梗死发生率。不同人群在非致命性和致命性冠心病事件发生率方面存在重大差异。这些差异反驳了高冠心病死亡率与高病死率或猝死相对过多相关的观点。大量冠心病死亡病例缺乏诊断信息令人担忧。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验