Kohrt W M, Ehsani A A, Birge S J
Washington University School of Medicine, Department of Internal Medicine, St. Louis, Missouri, USA.
J Bone Miner Res. 1997 Aug;12(8):1253-61. doi: 10.1359/jbmr.1997.12.8.1253.
This study compared the effects of two exercise training programs, 11 months in duration, on bone mineral density (BMD) in older, sedentary women. Thirty-nine women, aged 60-74 years, were assigned to the following groups: (a) a group that performed exercises that introduced stress to the skeleton through ground-reaction forces (GRF) (i.e., walking, jogging, stairs); (b) a group that performed exercises that introduced stress to the skeleton through joint-reaction forces (JRF) (i.e., weight lifting, rowing); or (c) a no-exercise control group. BMD of the whole body, lumbar spine, proximal femur, and distal forearm was assessed five times at approximately 3-month intervals. The GRF and JRF exercise programs resulted in significant and similar increases in BMD of the whole body (2.0 +/- 0.8% and 1.6 +/- 0.4%, respectively), lumbar spine (1.8 +/- 0.7% and 1.5 +/- 0.5%, respectively), and Ward's triangle region of the proximal femur (6.1 +/- 1.5% and 5.1 +/- 2.1%, respectively). There was a significant in BMD of the femoral neck only in response to the GRF exercise program (GRF, 3.5 +/- 0.8%; JRF, -0.2 +/- 0.7%). There were no significant changes in BMD in control subjects. Among all exercisers, there was a significant inverse (r = -0.52, p < 0.01) relationship between increases in whole body BMD and reductions in fat mass, suggesting a dose response effect of exercise on bone mass. Although femoral neck BMD was responsive only to the GRF exercise program, some adaptations (i.e., increase in lean body mass and strength) that were specific to the JRF exercise program may be important in preventing osteoporotic fractures by reducing the risk for falls. It remains to be determined whether all of these benefits can be gained through a training program that combines the different types of exercises employed in this study.
本研究比较了两个为期11个月的运动训练项目对久坐不动的老年女性骨密度(BMD)的影响。39名年龄在60 - 74岁的女性被分为以下几组:(a)一组进行通过地面反作用力(GRF)对骨骼施加压力的运动(即步行、慢跑、爬楼梯);(b)一组进行通过关节反作用力(JRF)对骨骼施加压力的运动(即举重、划船);或(c)一个不运动的对照组。全身、腰椎、股骨近端和前臂远端的骨密度大约每隔3个月评估一次,共评估5次。GRF和JRF运动项目使全身骨密度(分别为2.0±0.8%和1.6±0.4%)、腰椎骨密度(分别为1.8±0.7%和1.5±0.5%)以及股骨近端Ward三角区骨密度(分别为6.1±1.5%和5.1±2.1%)显著且相似地增加。仅GRF运动项目使股骨颈骨密度显著增加(GRF,3.5±0.8%;JRF, - 0.2±0.7%)。对照组的骨密度没有显著变化。在所有运动者中,全身骨密度增加与脂肪量减少之间存在显著的负相关(r = - 0.52,p < 0.01),表明运动对骨量有剂量反应效应。虽然股骨颈骨密度仅对GRF运动项目有反应,但JRF运动项目特有的一些适应性变化(即瘦体重和力量增加)可能通过降低跌倒风险在预防骨质疏松性骨折方面很重要。是否可以通过结合本研究中使用的不同类型运动的训练项目获得所有这些益处,仍有待确定。