Marranzano M, Castagna A, Pitrolo S, Ursino A, Mauro L
Istituto di Igiene e Medicina Preventiva dell' Università, Catania, Italy.
New Microbiol. 1997 Jul;20(3):283-7.
Hybridization assay and direct immunoassay for detecting Salmonella in contaminated surface waters have been compared with the conventional culture procedure. The 67 samples examined were taken from different rivers in the provinces of Catania and Ragusa. By culture method, Salmonella was isolated in 23 samples (34%), while direct immunoassay revealed the presence of Salmonella in 58 samples (87%) and the hybridization method identified Salmonella in 20 samples (30%). On the basis of the results obtained, the direct immunoassay method proved to be inaccurate for the high number of false positives revealed. The DNA probe test gave almost identical results to those obtained with the culture method, with notably shorter execution times than the latter. This test proved to be both sensitive and specific and could be used for the direct demonstration of Salmonella in surface waters where it is easier to find bacteria under stress from the environmental conditions, in waters where isolation is difficult, and in all those environmental control conditions which do not require isolation and the serological typing of the strains of Salmonella.
已将用于检测受污染地表水中沙门氏菌的杂交检测法和直接免疫检测法与传统培养程序进行了比较。所检测的67个样本取自卡塔尼亚省和拉古萨省的不同河流。通过培养方法,在23个样本(34%)中分离出沙门氏菌,而直接免疫检测法显示58个样本(87%)中存在沙门氏菌,杂交检测法在20个样本(30%)中鉴定出沙门氏菌。根据所获得的结果,直接免疫检测法因显示出大量假阳性而被证明不准确。DNA探针检测结果与培养法几乎相同,且执行时间明显短于培养法。该检测法被证明既灵敏又特异,可用于直接证明地表水中的沙门氏菌,在这些地表水中更容易发现受环境条件压力的细菌,在难以进行分离的水体中,以及在所有那些不需要分离和对沙门氏菌菌株进行血清学分型的环境控制条件下。