Rabey J M, Bass H, Bonuccelli U, Brooks D, Klotz P, Korczyn A D, Kraus P, Martinez-Martin P, Morrish P, Van Sauten W, Van Hilten B
Department of Neurology, Tel-Aviv Sourasky Medical Center, Israel.
Clin Neuropharmacol. 1997 Aug;20(4):322-37.
The extensive use of the Unified Parkinson's Disease Rating Scale (UPDRS) has revealed low interrater reliability in some items and redundancy in others. In view of these shortcomings, we have structured a new scale that includes a zero-to three-point scale for each item in the evaluation of PD. The mental axis includes memory, thought disorders, and depression. Activities of daily living (ADL) includes eight items: speech, eating, feeding, dressing, hygiene, handwriting, walking, and turning in bed. The motor examination includes eight items: speech, tremor, rest and posture, rigidity, finger tapping, arising from chair, gait, and postural stability. Complications of therapy were also included: dyskinesias, dystonia, motor fluctuations, and freezing episodes, collected by history. In addition, a global scoring for motor fluctuations that should complement the Hoehn and Yahr Scale was incorporated. In this report, we present a statistical analysis of the ADL, motor evaluation, and complications of therapy sections. Concerning the interrater reliability mean, Kendall's W values were >0.9 for most of the items in the Short Parkinson's Evaluation Scale (SPES). Kendall's W <0.8 (motor evaluation) was found for two items of the SPES and nine items of the UPDRS. The mean interrater reliability for both scales across all seven centers (seven Kendall's W for seven centers) (Mann-Whitney test) showed no statistical differences between the scales. Spearman's correlations between items of both scales were significant. Factor analysis of the SPES and UPDRS data revealed a four-factor solution that explained approximately 60% of the data. All participating centers found the SPES easier to apply and quicker to complete, when compared with the UPDRS. The results obtained strongly favor the introduction of SPES for clinical practice.
统一帕金森病评定量表(UPDRS)的广泛应用显示,某些项目的评分者间信度较低,而另一些项目则存在冗余。鉴于这些缺点,我们构建了一个新的量表,在帕金森病评估中每个项目采用0至3分制。精神方面包括记忆、思维障碍和抑郁。日常生活活动(ADL)包括八项:言语、进食、喂食、穿衣、卫生、书写、行走和床上翻身。运动检查包括八项:言语、震颤、休息和姿势、强直、手指轻敲、从椅子上起身、步态和姿势稳定性。治疗并发症也包括在内:异动症、肌张力障碍、运动波动和冻结发作,通过病史收集。此外,纳入了一项应补充Hoehn和Yahr量表的运动波动总体评分。在本报告中,我们对ADL、运动评估和治疗并发症部分进行了统计分析。关于评分者间信度均值,短帕金森病评估量表(SPES)的大多数项目的肯德尔W值>0.9。在SPES的两个项目和UPDRS的九个项目中发现肯德尔W<0.8(运动评估)。对所有七个中心的两个量表的评分者间信度均值(七个中心的七个肯德尔W值)(曼-惠特尼检验)显示,两个量表之间无统计学差异。两个量表项目之间的斯皮尔曼相关性显著。对SPES和UPDRS数据的因子分析得出了一个四因子解决方案,该方案解释了约60%的数据。与UPDRS相比,所有参与中心都发现SPES更易于应用且完成速度更快。所获得的结果强烈支持在临床实践中引入SPES。