Kunz B, Oranje A P, Labrèze L, Stalder J F, Ring J, Taïeb A
Eppendorf University Hospital, Hamburg, Germany.
Dermatology. 1997;195(1):10-9. doi: 10.1159/000245677.
We have previously reported how the SCORAD index was designed. This cumulative index combines objective (extent and intensity of lesions) and subjective (daytime pruritus and sleep loss) criteria.
To study interobserver variability in scoring for objective SCORAD criteria and to optimize the scoring guidelines.
Three scoring sessions were organized in 1993-1994 in Hamburg, Bordeaux and Rotterdam totalizing 19 patients (14 children and 5 adults) and 23 physicians, among whom 12 participated in at least 2 scoring sessions; 169 evaluation sheets have been processed using the SCORAD File Marker Pro software. At each session, total body photographs and close-up views were taken of each patient, and this material was reviewed at the final evaluation.
The extent of lesions according to the rule of nines showed interobserver variability mostly for patients with lesions of moderate intensity involving 20-60% of body surface. Intensity items were scored with more consistency overall, but variations subsided especially for oozing/crusts and lichenifications. Low and high scorer profiles and the benefit of training were noted.
This study has allowed to optimize clinical scoring using the SCORAD system. A proposal has been made to grade the severity of atopic dermatitis according to objective criteria in three groups for inclusion in clinical trials. The SCORAD index remains the major criterion for follow-up in trials.
我们之前已报道了SCORAD指数的设计方法。这个累积指数综合了客观标准(皮损范围和严重程度)和主观标准(日间瘙痒及睡眠障碍)。
研究观察者间在客观SCORAD标准评分上的差异,并优化评分指南。
1993年至1994年在汉堡、波尔多和鹿特丹组织了三次评分活动,共有19名患者(14名儿童和5名成人)和23名医生参与,其中12名医生至少参加了2次评分活动;使用SCORAD文件标记专业软件处理了169份评估表。每次活动时,为每位患者拍摄全身照片和特写照片,这些资料在最终评估时进行回顾。
根据九分法得出的皮损范围,观察者间差异主要出现在皮损强度为中度、累及体表20%至60%的患者中。总体而言,强度项目的评分一致性更高,但渗出/结痂和苔藓化方面的差异尤其减小。注意到了高分者和低分者的特征以及培训的益处。
本研究有助于优化使用SCORAD系统的临床评分。已提出一项建议,根据客观标准将特应性皮炎的严重程度分为三组,以便纳入临床试验。SCORAD指数仍然是试验随访的主要标准。