Angst J, Merikangas K
Psychiatric University Hospital Zurich, Switzerland.
J Affect Disord. 1997 Aug;45(1-2):31-9; discussion 39-40. doi: 10.1016/s0165-0327(97)00057-8.
The spectrum of depression is much wider than that reflected in the current diagnostic nomenclature. A large proportion of subjects with depression both in treatment and in the community fail to meet diagnostic criteria for either major depressive disorder (MDD) or dysthymia. Inclusion of subthreshold categories of depression dramatically improves the coverage of treated depression, particularly in community samples, and better enables the characterization of its longitudinal course. This paper investigates the application of diagnostic criteria for both threshold and subthreshold categories of depression in a prospective longitudinal community study of young adults from Zurich, Switzerland. We present the prevalence and treatment rates of each of the depressive subtypes, the degree of diagnostic overlap and the longitudinal stability of subthreshold and threshold categories of depression. The findings indicate that the prevalence rates of subthreshold categories of depression are quite high in the community, and that a substantial proportion of subthreshold depressives, particularly those with recurrent depression, receive treatment. There is a strong tendency for individuals to meet multiple depressive subtypes over time, with little stability of individual categories among those who continue to manifest depression over a 15-year period. The prospective longitudinal data reveal that major depression is both an antecedent to and sequela of subthreshold categories, providing evidence for the validity of the spectrum concept of depression. However, the need for a threshold for the symptom criteria is suggested by the lack of predictive value of minor depression and depressive symptoms only. These result suggest that both the current symptom threshold for a depressive syndrome and recurrence, but not the minimum duration of depressive episodes, are important components of the classification of depression.
抑郁症的范围比当前诊断术语所反映的要广泛得多。在接受治疗的抑郁症患者以及社区中的抑郁症患者中,很大一部分人不符合重度抑郁症(MDD)或心境恶劣障碍的诊断标准。纳入阈下抑郁症类别可显著提高对接受治疗的抑郁症的覆盖范围,尤其是在社区样本中,并且能更好地描述其病程。本文在一项对瑞士苏黎世年轻人进行的前瞻性纵向社区研究中,调查了阈上和阈下抑郁症类别的诊断标准的应用情况。我们呈现了每种抑郁亚型的患病率和治疗率、诊断重叠程度以及阈下和阈上抑郁症类别的纵向稳定性。研究结果表明,社区中阈下抑郁症类别的患病率相当高,而且相当一部分阈下抑郁症患者,尤其是那些复发性抑郁症患者接受了治疗。随着时间推移,个体有很强的倾向会符合多种抑郁亚型,在持续15年表现出抑郁症状的个体中,各个类别之间几乎没有稳定性。前瞻性纵向数据显示,重度抑郁症既是阈下抑郁症类别的前驱症状,也是其后果,这为抑郁症的谱系概念的有效性提供了证据。然而,仅轻度抑郁症和抑郁症状缺乏预测价值这一点表明,症状标准需要一个阈值。这些结果表明,当前抑郁综合征的症状阈值以及复发情况,而非抑郁发作的最短持续时间,是抑郁症分类的重要组成部分。