Suppr超能文献

欧洲51个中心使用小儿支气管镜(包括柔性和刚性支气管镜)的情况。

Use of the paediatric bronchoscope, flexible and rigid, in 51 European centres.

作者信息

Barbato A, Magarotto M, Crivellaro M, Novello A, Cracco A, de Blic J, Scheinmann P, Warner J O, Zach M

机构信息

Dept of Pediatrics, University of Padova, Italy.

出版信息

Eur Respir J. 1997 Aug;10(8):1761-6. doi: 10.1183/09031936.97.10081761.

Abstract

We have undertaken a survey to establish current practices and differences in the use of bronchoscopes in children in European centres. A questionnaire was sent to all 220 members of the Paediatric Assembly of the European Respiratory Society (ERS). The questions concerned the following points: indications for bronchoscopy; site of bronchoscopy; type of sedation; any oxygen supplementation during the procedure; number of procedures performed in the previous 12 months; number of procedures performed in the neonatal intensive care unit; number of bronchoalveolar lavages (BALs); side-effects during and after the procedures; and diagnostic yield. Fifty one European centres (40.8% of the European centres contacted) took part in the study. A total of 7,446 bronchoscopies had been performed in the last 12 months: 4,587 using the flexible bronchoscope and 2,859 using the rigid bronchoscope. At centres using only the fibreoptic bronchoscope, the most frequent indication was "recurrent/persistent pneumonia" (17%); at centres using only the rigid bronchoscope, it was "foreign body inhalation" (36.7%); at centres using both methods, the most frequent indication was "other indications" (23.9%). In 12 months, 2,231 BALs were performed: 1,419 in immunocompetent children and 812 in immunocompromised patients. In centres using only the fibreoptic bronchoscope, the highest yield was for "stridor" (81%); in centres using only the rigid bronchoscope, the highest yield was for "persistent atelectasis" (68%); and in centres using both instruments, it was for "foreign body inhalation" (93%). The results of the study suggest that bronchoscopy in children is now a well-established procedure at several European centres, while others are just beginning to use this technique.

摘要

我们开展了一项调查,以确定欧洲各中心儿童支气管镜使用的当前做法及差异。向欧洲呼吸学会(ERS)儿科大会的所有220名成员发送了问卷。问题涉及以下几点:支气管镜检查的适应症;支气管镜检查的部位;镇静类型;检查过程中是否吸氧;过去12个月内进行的检查次数;新生儿重症监护病房进行的检查次数;支气管肺泡灌洗(BAL)的次数;检查过程中和检查后的副作用;以及诊断阳性率。51个欧洲中心(占所联系欧洲中心的40.8%)参与了该研究。在过去12个月里共进行了7446例支气管镜检查:4587例使用可弯曲支气管镜,2859例使用硬质支气管镜。在仅使用纤维支气管镜的中心,最常见的适应症是“反复/持续肺炎”(17%);在仅使用硬质支气管镜的中心,是“异物吸入”(36.7%);在同时使用两种方法的中心,最常见的适应症是“其他适应症”(23.9%)。在12个月内进行了2231例BAL:1419例在免疫功能正常的儿童中进行,812例在免疫功能低下的患者中进行。在仅使用纤维支气管镜的中心,最高阳性率是“喘鸣”(81%);在仅使用硬质支气管镜的中心,最高阳性率是“持续性肺不张”(68%);在同时使用两种器械的中心,是“异物吸入”(93%)。研究结果表明,儿童支气管镜检查目前在几个欧洲中心已成为一种成熟的检查方法,而其他中心才刚刚开始使用这项技术。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验