Suppr超能文献

新型聚氨酯泡沫敷料的评估

Evaluation of a new polyurethane foam dressing.

作者信息

Banks V, Bale S, Harding K, Harding E F

机构信息

Wound Healing Research Unit, University of Wales College of Medicine, Cardiff.

出版信息

J Wound Care. 1997 Jun;6(6):266-9. doi: 10.12968/jowc.1997.6.6.266.

Abstract

The treatment of moderately to heavily exuding wounds requires a dressing that will remove excess exudate while ensuring optimum conditions at the wound site and preventing maceration of the surrounding skin tissue. This prospective, stratified, randomised clinical trial was designed to assess the performance and safety of a new polyurethane foam dressing compared with a hydrocellular dressing. Both dressings are currently available to community nurses for the treatment of these wound types. Sixty-one patients recruited to the trial. They were grouped according to wound type: 20 leg ulcers, 20 Grade 2 or Grade 3 pressure sores and 21 other wounds that included traumatic, acute and chronic wounds and burns. Patients were randomized to treatment and dressing changes and assessments were undertaken as required. Condition of the wound and surrounding skin, comfort, ease of use and leakage from the dressing were monitored at each assessment. Treatment continued for six weeks or until the wound was lightly exuding (defined as absence of leakage with the dressing remaining in place for more than four days on two consecutive occasions). Photographs and tracings of the wounds were taken weekly. The results showed that the two dressings were similar in performance in that they could remain in place for approximately 2.5 days, irrespective of wound type. There were no statistically significant differences in surrounding skin condition, reduction in wound size, patient comfort or ease of application and removal.

摘要

对于中度至重度渗液伤口的治疗,需要一种敷料,既能去除过多的渗出液,又能确保伤口部位处于最佳状态,并防止周围皮肤组织浸渍。这项前瞻性、分层、随机临床试验旨在评估一种新型聚氨酯泡沫敷料与水凝胶敷料相比的性能和安全性。目前这两种敷料社区护士均可用于治疗此类伤口。61名患者参与了该试验。他们根据伤口类型分组:20例腿部溃疡、20例2级或3级压疮以及21例其他伤口,包括创伤性、急性和慢性伤口以及烧伤。患者被随机分配接受治疗,并根据需要更换敷料和进行评估。每次评估时监测伤口及周围皮肤的状况、舒适度、使用方便程度和敷料渗漏情况。治疗持续六周或直至伤口轻度渗液(定义为敷料连续两天留置超过四天无渗漏)。每周对伤口进行拍照和绘图。结果表明,两种敷料在性能上相似,无论伤口类型如何,它们都能留置约2.5天。在周围皮肤状况、伤口大小缩小、患者舒适度或应用和去除的难易程度方面,均无统计学上的显著差异。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验