University of Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Adv Skin Wound Care. 2011 Feb;24(2):78-84. doi: 10.1097/01.ASW.0000394027.82702.16.
A randomized controlled trial to evaluate the effectiveness of a polyhexamethylene biguanide (PHMB) foam dressing compared with a similar non-antimicrobial foam for the treatment of superficial bacterial burden, wound-associated pain, and reduction in wound size.
This study was conducted in 2 wound healing clinics-a university hospital-based clinic and a community-based clinic. Forty-five chronic wound subjects, stratified to either foot or leg ulcers, were followed for 5 weeks.
A multicenter, prospective, double-blind, pilot, randomized controlled clinical trial with 3 study visits (Weeks 0, 2, 4) documented pain and local wound characteristics using NERDS and STONEES clinical criteria to determine superficial bacterial damage or deep/surrounding infection.
The use of PHMB foam dressing was a significant predictor of reduced wound superficial bacterial burden (P = .016) at week 4 as compared with the foam alone. Pain reduction was also statistically significant at week 2 (P = .0006) and at week 4 (P = .02) in favor of the PHMB foam dressings. Polymicrobial organisms were recovered at week 4 in 5.3% in the PHMB foam dressing group versus 33% in the control group (P = .04). Subjects randomized to the PHMB foam dressing had a 35% median reduction in wound size by week 4, compared with 28% in the control group.
PHMB foam dressing successfully reduced chronic wound pain and bacterial burden.
一项随机对照试验评估聚六亚甲基双胍(PHMB)泡沫敷料与类似非抗菌泡沫敷料治疗浅表细菌负荷、与伤口相关的疼痛以及减少伤口面积的效果。
本研究在 2 个伤口愈合诊所进行-一所大学附属医院和一家社区诊所。45 例慢性伤口患者,分为足部或腿部溃疡,随访 5 周。
一项多中心、前瞻性、双盲、先导、随机对照临床试验,有 3 次研究访视(第 0、2、4 周),使用 NERDS 和 STONEES 临床标准记录疼痛和局部伤口特征,以确定浅表细菌损伤或深部/周围感染。
与单独使用泡沫敷料相比,PHMB 泡沫敷料的使用显著降低了第 4 周的伤口浅表细菌负荷(P =.016)。第 2 周(P =.0006)和第 4 周(P =.02)疼痛减轻也具有统计学意义,有利于 PHMB 泡沫敷料。第 4 周,PHMB 泡沫敷料组分离出 5.3%的多微生物病原体,而对照组为 33%(P =.04)。第 4 周时,随机分配到 PHMB 泡沫敷料组的患者伤口面积中位数减少 35%,而对照组为 28%。
PHMB 泡沫敷料成功减轻了慢性伤口疼痛和细菌负荷。