Suppr超能文献

使用新型聚六亚甲基双胍抗菌泡沫敷料减少慢性伤口的细菌负担和疼痛 - 临床试验结果。

Reduction of bacterial burden and pain in chronic wounds using a new polyhexamethylene biguanide antimicrobial foam dressing-clinical trial results.

机构信息

University of Toronto, Ontario, Canada.

出版信息

Adv Skin Wound Care. 2011 Feb;24(2):78-84. doi: 10.1097/01.ASW.0000394027.82702.16.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

A randomized controlled trial to evaluate the effectiveness of a polyhexamethylene biguanide (PHMB) foam dressing compared with a similar non-antimicrobial foam for the treatment of superficial bacterial burden, wound-associated pain, and reduction in wound size.

SETTING AND PARTICIPANTS

This study was conducted in 2 wound healing clinics-a university hospital-based clinic and a community-based clinic. Forty-five chronic wound subjects, stratified to either foot or leg ulcers, were followed for 5 weeks.

METHODS

A multicenter, prospective, double-blind, pilot, randomized controlled clinical trial with 3 study visits (Weeks 0, 2, 4) documented pain and local wound characteristics using NERDS and STONEES clinical criteria to determine superficial bacterial damage or deep/surrounding infection.

RESULTS

The use of PHMB foam dressing was a significant predictor of reduced wound superficial bacterial burden (P = .016) at week 4 as compared with the foam alone. Pain reduction was also statistically significant at week 2 (P = .0006) and at week 4 (P = .02) in favor of the PHMB foam dressings. Polymicrobial organisms were recovered at week 4 in 5.3% in the PHMB foam dressing group versus 33% in the control group (P = .04). Subjects randomized to the PHMB foam dressing had a 35% median reduction in wound size by week 4, compared with 28% in the control group.

CONCLUSIONS

PHMB foam dressing successfully reduced chronic wound pain and bacterial burden.

摘要

目的

一项随机对照试验评估聚六亚甲基双胍(PHMB)泡沫敷料与类似非抗菌泡沫敷料治疗浅表细菌负荷、与伤口相关的疼痛以及减少伤口面积的效果。

设置和参与者

本研究在 2 个伤口愈合诊所进行-一所大学附属医院和一家社区诊所。45 例慢性伤口患者,分为足部或腿部溃疡,随访 5 周。

方法

一项多中心、前瞻性、双盲、先导、随机对照临床试验,有 3 次研究访视(第 0、2、4 周),使用 NERDS 和 STONEES 临床标准记录疼痛和局部伤口特征,以确定浅表细菌损伤或深部/周围感染。

结果

与单独使用泡沫敷料相比,PHMB 泡沫敷料的使用显著降低了第 4 周的伤口浅表细菌负荷(P =.016)。第 2 周(P =.0006)和第 4 周(P =.02)疼痛减轻也具有统计学意义,有利于 PHMB 泡沫敷料。第 4 周,PHMB 泡沫敷料组分离出 5.3%的多微生物病原体,而对照组为 33%(P =.04)。第 4 周时,随机分配到 PHMB 泡沫敷料组的患者伤口面积中位数减少 35%,而对照组为 28%。

结论

PHMB 泡沫敷料成功减轻了慢性伤口疼痛和细菌负荷。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验