• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

社交网络中的学习与避孕选择。

Learning in social networks and contraceptive choice.

作者信息

Kohler H P

机构信息

Max Planck Institute for Demographic Research, Rostock, Germany.

出版信息

Demography. 1997 Aug;34(3):369-83.

PMID:9275246
Abstract

A puzzling observation in the diffusion of modern fertility control is the persistent diversity in contraceptive practices across communities or social strata. I propose a model of "learning in social networks" to explain this diversity with the random dynamics of word-of-mouth communication. Women are uncertain about the merits of modern contraception and estimate the different qualities of available method based on imprecise information from network partners. Their contraceptive choices are determined by this estimate and by private knowledge about one's personal characteristics. This process of social learning leads to path-dependent adoption of fertility control within, and diversity in contraceptive practices across villages or social strata.

摘要

现代生育控制传播过程中一个令人费解的现象是,不同社区或社会阶层在避孕方式上持续存在差异。我提出了一个“社交网络学习”模型,用口碑传播的随机动态来解释这种差异。女性对现代避孕方法的优点并不确定,她们根据从网络伙伴那里获得的不准确信息来评估现有方法的不同质量。她们的避孕选择由这种评估以及关于个人特征的私人知识决定。这种社会学习过程导致了村庄内部或社会阶层内部生育控制的路径依赖式采用,以及不同村庄或社会阶层在避孕方式上的差异。

相似文献

1
Learning in social networks and contraceptive choice.社交网络中的学习与避孕选择。
Demography. 1997 Aug;34(3):369-83.
2
Women's perceptions of the pill's potential health risks in Sri Lanka.斯里兰卡女性对避孕药潜在健康风险的认知。
Asia Pac Popul J. 1987 Sep;2(3):39-56.
3
Community characteristics, leaders, fertility and contraception in Bangladesh.孟加拉国的社区特征、领导人、生育率与避孕措施
Asia Pac Popul J. 1988 Jun;3(2):55-72.
4
Ethnic models of fertility behaviour in Sri Lanka.斯里兰卡生育行为的种族模式。
Asia Pac Popul J. 1987 Dec;2(4):29-42.
5
Men's social networks and contraception in Ghana.加纳男性的社交网络与避孕
J Biosoc Sci. 2008 May;40(3):413-29. doi: 10.1017/S0021932007002507. Epub 2007 Nov 8.
6
Determinants of individual fertility and contraceptive use: a review and synthesis of the literature.个体生育力与避孕措施使用的决定因素:文献综述与综合分析
Philipp Sociol Rev. 1979 Jul;27(3):211-34.
7
Kenya: many women know about contraceptives, but few use them.肯尼亚:许多女性了解避孕方法,但很少有人使用。
Prog Hum Reprod Res. 1991(18):5-6.
8
New IPPF statement on breastfeeding, fertility and post-partum contraception.国际计划生育联合会关于母乳喂养、生育力和产后避孕的新声明。
IPPF Med Bull. 1990 Apr;24(2):2-4.
9
[An idolized pill: a pill to be gilded...or resistance to oral contraception].[一种备受推崇的药丸:一颗有待镀金的药丸……还是对口服避孕药的抵抗]
Psychol Med (Paris). 1982 Jun;14(8):1173-9.
10
Contraceptive knowledge, attitudes, and practice in Russia during the 1980s.20世纪80年代俄罗斯的避孕知识、态度及实践。
Stud Fam Plann. 1993 Jul-Aug;24(4):227-35.

引用本文的文献

1
Fertility Desires and Contraceptive Transition.生育意愿与避孕方式的转变
Popul Dev Rev. 2024 Dec;50(Suppl 2):511-538. doi: 10.1111/padr.12669. Epub 2024 Oct 6.
2
Socially Connected Neighborhoods and the Spread of Sexually Transmitted Infections.社交关联的社区与性传播感染的传播。
Demography. 2022 Aug 1;59(4):1299-1323. doi: 10.1215/00703370-10054898.
3
"I talked to a couple of friends that had it": Informal feminized health networks and contraceptive method choices.“我和几个有过这种经历的朋友谈过”: 非正式女性化健康网络和避孕方法选择。

本文引用的文献

1
Judgment under Uncertainty: Heuristics and Biases.《不确定性下的判断:启发式与偏差》
Science. 1974 Sep 27;185(4157):1124-31. doi: 10.1126/science.185.4157.1124.
2
The diffusion of fertility control in Taiwan: evidence from pooled cross-section time-series models.台湾生育控制的扩散:来自混合横截面时间序列模型的证据。
Popul Stud (Camb). 1993 Nov;47(3):457-79. doi: 10.1080/0032472031000147246.
3
Community and contraceptive choice in rural Thailand: a case study of Nang Rong.泰国农村的社区与避孕选择:呵叻府南荣区的案例研究
Soc Sci Med. 2021 Oct;286:114318. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2021.114318. Epub 2021 Aug 14.
4
Method-specific beliefs and subsequent contraceptive method choice: Results from a longitudinal study in urban and rural Kenya.方法特异性信念与随后避孕方法选择:肯尼亚城乡纵向研究结果。
PLoS One. 2021 Jun 18;16(6):e0252977. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0252977. eCollection 2021.
5
Predictors of non-use of intrauterine contraception among women aged 18-49 years in a general practice setting in the UK.英国普通医疗环境中18至49岁女性未使用宫内避孕法的预测因素。
Open Access J Contracept. 2016 Oct 21;7:155-160. doi: 10.2147/OAJC.S116994. eCollection 2016.
6
Moving beyond the household: Innovations in data collection on kinship.超越家庭范畴:亲属关系数据收集的创新
Popul Stud (Camb). 2017 Mar;71(1):117-132. doi: 10.1080/00324728.2016.1262965. Epub 2017 Jan 31.
7
Perceived Interest in Vasectomy among Latina Women and their Partners in a Community with Limited Access to Female Sterilization.在女性绝育服务获取受限的社区中,拉丁裔女性及其伴侣对输精管切除术的感知兴趣。
J Health Care Poor Underserved. 2016;27(2):762-77. doi: 10.1353/hpu.2016.0083.
8
The association between education and induced abortion for three cohorts of adults in Finland.芬兰三组成年人群中教育与人工流产之间的关联。
Popul Stud (Camb). 2015;69(3):373-88. doi: 10.1080/00324728.2015.1083608. Epub 2015 Oct 8.
9
Social network- and community-level influences on contraceptive use: evidence from rural Poland.社交网络和社区层面因素对避孕措施使用的影响:来自波兰农村地区的证据
Proc Biol Sci. 2015 May 22;282(1807):20150398. doi: 10.1098/rspb.2015.0398.
10
Social learning about levels of perinatal and infant mortality in Niakhar, Senegal.塞内加尔尼亚喀尔地区围产期和婴儿死亡率水平的社会学习情况。
Soc Networks. 2012 May;34(2):264-274. doi: 10.1016/j.socnet.2012.01.001.
Demography. 1996 Feb;33(1):1-11.
4
A mathematical model for determining effectiveness of family planning clinics.
Stud Fam Plann. 1974 Jul;5(7):232-8.
5
Is it smart to play the horses? Comment on "A day at the races: a study of IQ, expertise, and cognitive complexity" (Ceci & Liker, 1986).赌马明智吗?评《赛马日:一项关于智商、专业技能与认知复杂性的研究》(塞西和利克,1986年)
J Exp Psychol Gen. 1988 Mar;117(1):91-5. doi: 10.1037//0096-3445.117.1.91.
6
Contraceptive method switching over women's reproductive careers: evidence from Malaysian life history data, 1940s-70s.
J Biosoc Sci Suppl. 1989;11:95-116. doi: 10.1017/s0021932000025438.