Suppr超能文献

前沿儿科学:我们需要临床伦理委员会吗?

Paediatrics at the cutting edge: do we need clinical ethics committees?

作者信息

Larcher V F, Lask B, McCarthy J M

机构信息

Great Ormond Street Hospital for Children, London.

出版信息

J Med Ethics. 1997 Aug;23(4):245-9. doi: 10.1136/jme.23.4.245.

Abstract

OBJECTIVES

To investigate the need for hospital clinical ethics committees by studying the frequency with which ethical dilemmas arose, the perceived adequacy of the process of their resolution, and the teaching and training of staff in medical ethics.

DESIGN

Interviews with individuals and three multidisciplinary teams; questionnaire to randomly selected individuals.

SETTING

Two major London children's hospitals.

RESULTS

Ethical dilemmas arose frequently but were resolved in a relatively unstructured fashion. Ethical concerns included: the validity of consent for investigations and treatment; lack of children's involvement in consent; initiation of heroic or futile treatments; resource allocation. Staff expressed the need for a forum which would provide consultation on ethical issues, develop guidelines for good ethical practice, undertake teaching and training, and provide ethical reflection outside the acute clinical setting.

CONCLUSION

Multidisciplinary, accountable and audited clinical ethics committees with predominantly advisory, practice development and educational roles could provide a valuable contribution to UK clinical practice and perhaps in other countries that have not developed hospital clinical ethics committees.

摘要

目的

通过研究伦理困境出现的频率、解决过程的感知充分性以及医务人员的医学伦理教学与培训情况,调查医院临床伦理委员会的必要性。

设计

对个人和三个多学科团队进行访谈;向随机抽取的个人发放问卷。

地点

伦敦的两家大型儿童医院。

结果

伦理困境频繁出现,但解决方式相对缺乏条理。伦理问题包括:检查和治疗同意书的有效性;儿童未参与同意过程;启动积极或无效的治疗;资源分配。工作人员表示需要一个论坛,该论坛能够就伦理问题提供咨询、制定良好伦理实践的指导方针、开展教学与培训,并在急性临床环境之外进行伦理反思。

结论

多学科、可问责且经过审核的临床伦理委员会,主要发挥咨询、实践发展和教育作用,可为英国临床实践做出宝贵贡献,或许对其他尚未设立医院临床伦理委员会的国家也有帮助。

相似文献

2
Hospital ethics committees in the United Kingdom.英国的医院伦理委员会。
HEC Forum. 1996 Oct;8(5):301-15. doi: 10.1007/BF00208647.
3
Is ethics consultation an elegant distraction?伦理咨询是一种巧妙的干扰吗?
HEC Forum. 1996 Jan;8(1):12-21; discussion 22-8. doi: 10.1007/BF00057972.
8
Clinical ethics committees--pros and cons.临床伦理委员会——利弊
J Med Ethics. 1997 Aug;23(4):203-4. doi: 10.1136/jme.23.4.203.
9
Hospital ethics committees in Paris.巴黎的医院伦理委员会。
Camb Q Healthc Ethics. 2000 Summer;9(3):424-8. doi: 10.1017/s0963180100003170.

引用本文的文献

3
Pediatric Ethics Consultation Services.儿科伦理咨询服务。
Pediatrics. 2023 Mar 1;151(3). doi: 10.1542/peds.2022-058947.
9
Development of clinical ethics committees.临床伦理委员会的发展。
BMJ. 2004 Apr 17;328(7445):950-2. doi: 10.1136/bmj.328.7445.950.

本文引用的文献

2
Can children withhold consent to treatment?儿童能否拒绝同意接受治疗?
BMJ. 1993 May 29;306(6890):1459-61. doi: 10.1136/bmj.306.6890.1459.
3
Children's consent to treatment.儿童对治疗的同意。
BMJ. 1994 May 7;308(6938):1182-3. doi: 10.1136/bmj.308.6938.1182.
5
Institutional ethics committees and the shield of immunity.
Ann Intern Med. 1994 Feb 15;120(4):320-5. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-120-4-199402150-00010.
6
The inhumanity of medicine.医学的不人道之处。
BMJ. 1994;309(6970):1671-2. doi: 10.1136/bmj.309.6970.1671.
7
Clinical ethics committee.临床伦理委员会
BMJ. 1995 Sep 9;311(7006):667-9. doi: 10.1136/bmj.311.7006.667.
10
A national ethics committee.一个国家伦理委员会。
BMJ. 1988;297(6664):1626-7. doi: 10.1136/bmj.297.6664.1626.

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验