Larcher V F, Lask B, McCarthy J M
Great Ormond Street Hospital for Children, London.
J Med Ethics. 1997 Aug;23(4):245-9. doi: 10.1136/jme.23.4.245.
To investigate the need for hospital clinical ethics committees by studying the frequency with which ethical dilemmas arose, the perceived adequacy of the process of their resolution, and the teaching and training of staff in medical ethics.
Interviews with individuals and three multidisciplinary teams; questionnaire to randomly selected individuals.
Two major London children's hospitals.
Ethical dilemmas arose frequently but were resolved in a relatively unstructured fashion. Ethical concerns included: the validity of consent for investigations and treatment; lack of children's involvement in consent; initiation of heroic or futile treatments; resource allocation. Staff expressed the need for a forum which would provide consultation on ethical issues, develop guidelines for good ethical practice, undertake teaching and training, and provide ethical reflection outside the acute clinical setting.
Multidisciplinary, accountable and audited clinical ethics committees with predominantly advisory, practice development and educational roles could provide a valuable contribution to UK clinical practice and perhaps in other countries that have not developed hospital clinical ethics committees.
通过研究伦理困境出现的频率、解决过程的感知充分性以及医务人员的医学伦理教学与培训情况,调查医院临床伦理委员会的必要性。
对个人和三个多学科团队进行访谈;向随机抽取的个人发放问卷。
伦敦的两家大型儿童医院。
伦理困境频繁出现,但解决方式相对缺乏条理。伦理问题包括:检查和治疗同意书的有效性;儿童未参与同意过程;启动积极或无效的治疗;资源分配。工作人员表示需要一个论坛,该论坛能够就伦理问题提供咨询、制定良好伦理实践的指导方针、开展教学与培训,并在急性临床环境之外进行伦理反思。
多学科、可问责且经过审核的临床伦理委员会,主要发挥咨询、实践发展和教育作用,可为英国临床实践做出宝贵贡献,或许对其他尚未设立医院临床伦理委员会的国家也有帮助。